HISTORY OF Ps 4 se ee le THE CALIPHS~ BY JALALU’DDIN A’S SUYUTI, TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL ARABIC BY MAJOR H. S. JARRETT, SECRETARY AND MEMBER, BOARD OF EXAMINERS, FORT WILLIAM, FELLOW OF THE CALCUTTA UNIVERSITY. OIL SS CALCUTTA : PRINTED BY J. फ. THOMAS, BAPTIST MISSION PRESS. AND PUBLISHED BY THE ASIATIC SOCIETY, 57, PARK STREET. 1881. CARPENTIER INTRODUCTION. Extensive as is the reputation of as Suydti as a distinguished author and scholar, and unsurpassed for the number and range of the works which in every branch of literature known to his age, his unwearied pen never ceased to produce, we are indebted to the malice or envy of but one of his contemporaries and to his own testimony, for the few details of his life and studies that we possess. Reference to one or other of his multitudi- nous volumes is made by writers of his own and succeeding times where the kindred subject of which they treat naturally calls for it, but only one contemporary biographical notice of him besides his own, is extant. To these I shall presently refer. Haji Khalifah, at the close of his Lexicon, gives a detailed list of as Suytti’s works, prefaced by a column of laudatory epithets which have less the ring of sincere admiration than of conventional panegyric, yet his wonder or his envy might well offer the incense of adulation to the astonishing author of five hundred and four volumes, Kuranic exegesis, Tradition and its cognate subjects, jurisprudence, philology, rhetoric, prose and poetical composition, the phenomena of nature, curiosities of literature, discourses on social questions, criticism, history, biography, all these were fields not too vast for his discursive intelligence and none too minute for his indefatigable industry. Some of his compositions are indeed, nothing more than pamphlets of smaller compass than many an article of a modern Review, but a considerable number, to judge from some of those, about one-fifth of the whole, that have come down to us, must have been of goodly bulk. It would doubtless have been better for his reputation as it would assuredly have been more profitable to the generality of his readers, had he confined his labours to the production of a few works of universal interest and written for posterity rather than for his day. By far the greater part of his writings were on subjects which have no interest to a European student. Two hundred and six works on Tradition and ninety-one on Jurisprudence would, it might be supposed, have been thoroughly exhaus- tive had not another line been previously written regarding them, yet this 8$1870¢ | iv J was the contribution of but one author to the store of countless volumes that had already preceded his labours and had been forgotten, to be follow- ed by others as countless and as unremembered. However much we may regret this misapplied diligence, the age in which as Suyuti lived, naturally moulded his literary tastes and influenced his course of study, and he but reflected its spirit in seeking pre-eminence among the scholarly and erudite of his nation after the manner in which they had attained it. Legal studies, inseparably connected as they are with the religion of the Moslems, were of the utmost consequence from the very infancy of Islam, and at a time when the Crescent waved from the pillars of Hercules to the steppes of Tartary, they formed a necessary part of the education of all cultured minds. Every Moslem author or nearly every one with whom we are acquainted, was either a recognized doctor of jurisprudence or had studied it under some one of its famous masters. No college was founded but we read that its first chairs were those of Tradition and Law. Other branches of knowledge were indeed, far from neglected. Grammar, Medicine and the complicated problems of Inheritance were cultivated with assiduity and success, but with the exception of the first mentioned of this Eastern Trivium, which is rather an instrument of knowledge than an end in itself, they occupied, the second place. In the great Mustangiriyah College built on the eastern bank of the Tigris at Baghdad by the Caliph al Mustangir and endowed by his splendid muni- ficence, provision was first made, as as Suyitti tells us, for Chairs of the four great Schools of Muhammadan law. The next was that of Tradition, the third of Grammar, followed by professorships of Medicine and the Law of Inheritance. De Slane in his Introduction to Ibn Khallikan’s Biogra- 10111९8] Dictionary has described the system of education pursued during the times of which we write. The young student, he says, commenced his labours by learning the Kuran by heart, and as many of the traditions as he was able to acquire at his native place: to this he joined a slight acquaintance with grammar and some knowledge of poetry. On attaining the age of fourteen or sixteen, he began his travels and visited the great cities where he learnt traditions and received certificates of licence to relate them, from eminent traditionists. He then followed the courses of lectures held in the mosques or colleges, and generally attached himself to one of the professors. He there learnt by heart the most approved works on the dogmas of religion, and studied their commentaries under the tuition of his master, He acquired a knowledge of the different readings of the Kuran and of its orthodox interpretation, wlnilst he pursued the study of ancient poetry and philology, grammar and rhetoric. The second- ary points of jurisprudence, forming the doctrines of the school to which he belonged, next became the object of his study and an acquaintance with | र ] logic and dialectics completed his education. Having obtained from his professors, certificates of capacity and license to teach the works he had mastered, he was eligible for the posts of preacher, Kadhi, Mufti, Imam or professor. Under a system so universal in its adoption and so rigidly upheld by learned opinion as the sole method of orthodox mental discipline, profitable as a means of worldly advancement as well as the most salutary for the soul, it is not surprising that the literary efforts of as Suytti should bear principally upon those studies to which such an exaggerated importance was attached by his age. Besides the treatises on Jurisprudence and Tradition already mentioned, his commentaries and writings on the Kuran number thirty-five. Philology, Grammar and Rhetoric claim sixty-three of his volumes. Seventy-six were his contribution to general literature, and thirty-three were devoted to history and biography. For this classi- fied list of his writings, we are indebted to his own autobiography in his well-known work entitled Husn al Muhadhirab fi akhbar 11 Misr wa’l Kahirah (agreeable colloquy on Misr and Cairo). This autobiography has been published with a Latin version by Albert Meursinge in the Prolegomena to his edition of as Suytti’s Tabakat u’l Mufassirin (Classes of the Interpreters of the Kurdn). But asitis a work not easily accessible and no English translation of the original has as yet appeared I cannot more fitly introduce the author to those interested in his life, than in his own words. ‘The author of this work,’? he writes, “is Abu’l Fadhl A’bdu’r Rahman-b-u’l Kamél Abu Bakr-b-Nagiri’ddin Muhammad-b-Sabiki’ddin Abi Bakr-b-Fakhr Othman-b-Nasgiriddin Muhammad-b-Sayfi’ddin Khidhr- b-Najmi’ddin Abi’s Salah Ayytb-b-Nasiri’ddin Muhammad-b-i’s Shaykh Humami’ddin al Khudhayri al Usuyuti.* In recording the narrative of my life in this book, I have but followed the example of recent writers, for it is rarely that any of them has published a history without introducing therein his own biography.f Regarding my ancestor Humamu’ddin, I have to observe that he was one of the masters of the spiritual life and of the doctors of the mystics. Mention of him will follow in the section treating on the Stfis. The others who came after him were men of position and authority. Of these, one exercised judicial functions in his own city, another held the office of inspector of markets, another accompanied the Amir Shaykhuft and * The name is written Usuyiti or Suyiti indifferently. + I here omit a list of authors and their works, as irrelevant to the main subject of the writer’s life. t See page 529. Further particulars of him are furnished by Weil. Gesch. Abb. Cal. Eg. pp. 475, 477, seg. [ श | founded and endowed a college at Suyut ;* another was a wealthy mer- chant, but I know of none who altogether devoted himself to the acquisi- tion of learning except my father, a notice of whom will occur in the section treating of the 81871४6 jurisconsults. As regards our connection with the name of Khudhayri, I do not know to what it can refer save the Khudhayri quarter of Baghdad, and in fact, a person whom I can implicitly trust, told me that he heard my father—may God have mercy on him—say, that his ancestor was a Persian or from the East. The connection therefore is apparently with the quarter above mentioned. I was born after sunset on Saturday night the 1st Rajab, 849 (8rd October, 1445), and I was carried, my father being then living, to the Shaykh Muhammad the recluse, a man eminent for sanctity, near the Nafisit tomb, who gave me his blessing. I grew up an orphan and I learnt the Kuraén before I was eight years of age. I next got by-heart the U’mdah, the Minhaju’l Fikh wa’l Ugil and the Alfi’yah of Ibn Malik. From the beginning of year 64 I began to devote myself to learning. I studied jurisprudence and grammar under a number of doctors and read the law of inheritance with the learned and most distinguished professor of his age in that science, the Shaykh Shihabu’ddin as Sharimsahi who used to say that he had arrived at a great age and had passed a hundred by many years. God knows best. I read with him his commentary on the Majmiu’.t and received a certificate of licence to teach the Arabic language in the beginning of the year 66. In this year I became an author. The first work I composed was an exposition of the formula 411; 5961§ and &Ui om) which I submitted to my master the Shaykh ण Islim A’lamu’ddin al Bulkini|| who wrote to mein praise of it. 1 con- tinued to study jurisprudence with him till his death. I also read with him from the beginning the Tadrib,Q by his father, up to the chapter on * In Upper Egypt on the western bank of the Nileabout 27° lat. Yakut speaks of it as having contained 75 Christian churches and a large Christian population. + See Note { page 509. +t Al Majmiv’ fi i’lm 11 Faraidh, by A’bdu’llah Shamsu’ddin Mukhammad-b-Sharaf al Killéi as Shafi'i: died 777 (1375). प. K. § My MS. has 88 \Rinel and omits the second word. The work referred to will be found in his list under the first heading. | Abu’l Bak& Sélib-b-Omar-b-Raslfin A’lam u’ddin al Bulkini was born 791 (1388) and died 868 (1463). Mcurs. He was named Bulkini after Bulkinah in Egypt in the district of Hauf. q ear | gs? Ay (Excrcitatus de partibus juris specialibus) auctore Sirdju’ddin Omar-b-Raslan Bolkeini Shafi’ita, anno 805 (1463) mortuo. प, ए, [ wu ] Procuration. I heard his lectures on the HAwi as Saghir*® from the beginning, to the chapter de Statibus Mulieris; and on the Minhaj from the beginning, to the chapter on the Poor-rate: and onthe Tanbiht from its commencement nearly up to the chapter on the Poor-rate; likewise a portion of ar Raudhahf{ from the chapter on the Judicial office: a portion of the supplement to the commentary on the Minhaj by az Zarkashi ;§ and from the chapter on the Cultivation of Waste lands, to the chapter on Testaments or thereabouts. In the year 67 he granted me a license to teach jurisprudence and to decide on eases proposed to me and was present at my inauguration. || When he died in the year 68, I resorted to the Shaykh प] Islam Sharafu’ddin al Munawil and read with him a portion of the Minh4j. I heard his Expositions on Partition except a few lectures which I missed and I attended his readings from the commentary al Bahjah,** and its marginal notes by him, and from the commentary on the Kuran by al Baydhawi. For traditions and the Arabic language, I read with our Shaykh the learned Imam Taki’uddin as Shumunni the Hanafite and continued with him for four years. He wrote to me in praise of two of my compositions, a commentary on the Alfiyah of Ibn Malik and the Jama’u’l Jawami’t¢ on the Arabic language, and he gave verbal and written testimony of my proficiency in the sciences on more than one occasion. He once acquiesced in my bare statement regarding a tradition, for verily he adduced in his marginal gloss on as Shifa,{{ the tradition of Abu’! Hamra on Captives and alleged its citation by Ibn Majah. 1 had occasion to quote it with its ascriptions and I therefore searched Ibn 11812} in the place where it was supposed to be, but I did not find it. Then I went through the whole book but did not light upon it. Suspect- * 866 p. 614 † There are many works of this name as well as that of Minhéj in H. K t ६०, is? 4.2) oS ee H. K § See D’Herb. art. Zerkeshi | Reference is made to this in the list of his works under the heading ^ Commen- taries and works on the Kuran.” @ Abu Zakariya Yahya-b-Muhammad Sharafu’ddin al Mun4éwi, died 871 (1466). Meurs. ** Al Bahjah al Wardiyah a commentary on the Hawi u’s Saghir by Zaynu’ddin Omar-b-Mudhaffar-b-i’] Wardi: died 749 (1348). प. K. tt BES Sxl 4? ६.०१ | €+> by Taju’ddin A’bdu’l Wah&b as Subki: died 771 (1369). प. ए tt (८.८० ॥ (~ wird ५ RAS! by the Imém Héfidh Abu'l Fadhl I'yéah- b-Musa Yahsabi: died 544 (1149). H. K. notes on this book at some length and mentions the gloss of as Shumunni [| vin | ing an oversight, I read it through a second time and again found it not. I returned to ita third time but did not discover it. I saw it, however, in the Catalogue of the companions by Ibn Kani’, upon which I went to the Shaykh and informed him. On hearing this from me, he at once took up his manuscript and taking a pen, he struck out the name of Ibn Majah and wrote Ibn Kani’ in the margin. I was distressed at this and dis- mayed, on account of the great veneration in which I held the Shaykh, and the contemptuous opinion I had of myself and I said ^“ will you not wait a little, perhaps you may consult the work yourself?” He replied: ^ No, I relied for Ibn Majah on the authority of Burhan al Halabi.” I did not quit the Shaykh until his death, when I attended our Shaykh the learned and most eminent master al Kafiaji* for fourteen years. I studied under him various branches of knowledge such as Kuranic exegesis, the funda- mentals of doctrine, the Arabic language, rhetoric and others and he gave me ahigh diploma. I next attended many lectures of the Shaykh Sayfu’- ddin Hanafit on the Kashshaf,f on the Taudhih with his gloss thereon, the Talkhi’s u’l Miftah and the A’dhud, and I began to write works in the year 66. My writings up to this time numbered 300 works exclusive of those I obliterated and left unfinished, and they penetrated, praise be to God, the countries of Syria, Hij4az, Yaman, India, Mauritania and Takrir.§ When I made the pilgrimage, I drank of the water of the well Zemzem with various intentions: among others that I should arrive in Jurisprudence to the eminence of Shaykh Sirdéju’ddin al Bulkini, and in Tradition to the distinction of the Hafidh Ibn Hajr. From the beginning of the year 71 I gave decisions on points of law aud I employed myself in writing traditions from the beginning of the year 72. I acquired a pro- found knowledge of the seven sciences of Exegesis, Tradition, Jurisprudence, Grammar and the three branches of Rhetoric after the manner of the Arabs and the rhetoricians, and not after the fashion of the Persians and _philo- gophers. What I am conscious of is this, that the proficiency I attained in these six sciences (save jurisprudence) and the writings thereon which I perused, none of my Shaykhs ever reached therein nor were therewith # So Meurs. points the name ५१, 9 sti 1 us*ayt copa | चि w non > Wh born 790, died 879. According to the Lubbu'l Lubdab his name refers Lg ५3 9 41+3 BAS (1, ale’ ) lH) oy ds isl. + Muhammad-b-Muhammad-b-Omar-b-Ketlu Bogha al Yektamn, died in 881. As Suyuti wrote an clegy on him recorded in the Husn al Muhédh. Meurs. + The famous commentary of Zamakhshari. The Talkhi’s is a work on rhetoric by Kazwini. H. K. mentions several Taudhih. The A’dhud is ४ work on grammar by Abu A’li al Farisi composed for A’dhud u’d Dawlah. H. K. ms § In the extreme south of al Maghrab, aecording to Yakut, probably in the 8६०१६१०. [ ix ] acquainted, still less those inferior to them. I do not say the same, by Allah, of jurisprudence, for my Shaykh has a deeper insight and a larger grasp of the subject. After these seven branches of knowledge comes in a lower degree my acquaintance with the fundamentals of jurisprudence, with dialectics and grammatical inflexions. Below this, composition and epistolary style and the law of inheritance. Below this, the various read- ings of the Kuran which I did not study under any Shaykh* and next Me- dicine, but Arithmetic I found the most difficult to me and the most remote from my inclination, and when I apply myself to a question appertaining thereto, it is as though I strove to support a mountain. I have now completely acquired, praise be to the Most High, the means of diligently investigating and determining cases referred to me. I say this in acknowledgement of the favour of God and not in vain-glory, for what is the world that one should strive to gain it in glorying, now that the time of departure from it is approaching, and hoariness hath begun, and the best part of life hath passed. And now if I wished to write on every question, a dissertation with its statements and proofs, whether cited or reasoned from analogy, the perceptions of it by the mind, its refutations and vindications, and a comparison between the contrary opinions held regarding it, I should be able to do so by the grace of the Most High, and through Him, not of my own strength and ability, for there is no power or virtue but in God. Whatever God willeth, there is no power to accomplish 2८ save in God Himself. At the commencement of my studies, I read somewhat of the science of logic, but subsequently the Lord put a dislike of it into my heart, and hearing that Ibn u’s Salaht had decided a reference to him on the subject by interdicting it, I abandoned it for that reason, and the Lord supplied its place to me with the science of tradition which is the noblest of all studies. As for my Shaykhs in the relation of traditions whom [ heard, or from whom I received certificates of licence, they were numerous. I have adduced them in my Cataloguef to the number of about 150. I did not however, devote myself much to the hearing of traditions as I was employ- ed on what was of more tmportance, viz., the study of their critical exami- nation.” With these words concludes the autobiography which is followed by a catalogue of the author’s works. I have now to notice the only other memoir of him which we possess, and to which I have already alluded. This is furnished to us by his contemporary Muhammad-b-Abdi’r Rahmén- e ee we & os! ra 9 these words are in Meursinge, but not in my MS. † See page 431. t There are two of these, called the Greater and the Lesser Mua'jam which are given in his list of works. [ > ] b-Muhammad Shamsu'ddin as 88}८1 ६ फा, and is given by Meursinge in his Prolegomena and translated by him into Latin. This fragment, he states, is taken from the Leyden Codex 518. (Oatal क. 1876.) entitled COU at ८० al) ow) (Luna oriens ex lwmine micante) by Ahmad-b- Abdi’s Salam KAdhi of Manif.- It contains an excerpt of the principal work of as Sakhdwi called @-W! ५, Jey eo Sa) (lumen micans hominibus seculi noni) and gives amongst the celebrities of that age, the following notice of as Suyiiti : ^ He was born on the first night of the month of Rajab 849, his mother being a Turkish slave, and he was reared an orphan. He learnt एक -06€भ the Kurdn, the U’mdah, the 2110708} both the section on the derivative and part of the fundamental principles, and the Alfi’yah on grammar. Having proved his capacity in the year 64, he studied gram- mar under Shamsu’ddin Muhammad-b-Miasa al Hanafi Imam of the Shaykhiniyah College, and under al Fakhr Othman al Maksi,* as Shams al Bami,t Ibn प] Falati,t Ibn Yusuf one of the most eminent doctors of the Shaykhuniyah, al Burhan al A’jlani, and according to some, under an Nua’m4ni, with some of them, jurisprudence, with some, grammar. He progressed until he read some works on jurisprudence under al A’lam al Bulkini. He then read with 8] Munadwi for a very short time who gave him a lesson in good manners when, pained at his taking a seat at the head of the assembly, he said, “‘ when we were young, we never sat save behind the circle of distinguished personages such as these.” On this he broke off§ from him and read altogether with as Sayfu’ddin, as Shumunni and al Kafiyaji the Hanafites, somewhat of the sciences, and also, as he asserts, with as 8111187 as Shdrimsdhi a part of his commentary on the Maj- miu’ of al Kalléi: likewise under al I’zz al Mik&ti his treatise on the Mikat,|| and under Muhammad-b-Ibréhim as Sharw4ni ar Rimi§[ the phy- * Othm&n-b-A’bdi’llah-b-Othm4n al Fakhr Abu A’mr al Maksi born 818 (1416), died 877 (1472). Maks is a village on the Nile adjacent to Cairo. † Mubammad-b-Ahmad as Shams al Bimi, born 820 (1417) died 885 (1480). Meurs. प॑ Mubammad-b-A’li al Kisi as 8140१, born 824, died 870. Ibid. § I do not follow Meursinge in his translation of @6%!—“tum vero totum 86 scientiis vovit.” This form of the verb bears the meaning of devoting one’s self to a thing, but the object is not mentioned and the ordinary signification of the word is here most applicable. The preceding passage is also misunderstood. The speaker is al Mundwi not as Suyiti. - | The Mikét is an appointed place of rendezvous for pilgrims proceeding to Mecca where they first enter into the state of Ihr4m or prohibition from lawful acts which are at that period unlawful. These stations will be found mentioned in the Jémi’ Rumiz by Shamsu’ddin Muhammad al Kohisténi. Meursinge’s translation of Mikat “ horologia” is quite untenable. श्र Born 778 (1376), died 873 (1468). Moura. Cn | sician at Cairo, two abridgments on medicine by Ibn प] Jaméa’h,* and under al I’zz al Hanbali some studies in the fundamental principles of jurispru- dence from the Jama’ प] Jawami.’ Here ends what he asserts to have done. He attached himself to me for some time and wrote to me in a long prose epistle the following words, “and verily we presented ourselves uninvited to the feast of his compre. hensive bounty, and we made the camel of our affliction kneel in the spacious courtyard of his affluence.’’f Moreover he praised me on other occasions in verse and prose as I have elsewhere shown. In the same way, for a very short period he frequented the lectures of az Zayn Kasim al Hanafi and al Bikai’i. He also practised himself in poetry under as Shihab al Mangiri,f and he heard traditions from the compilers of tradi- tion then living such as al Kamméasi, al Hijdzi, as Shdwi, al Muktimi Nashwan and Hajir, and some doctors of Aleppo gave him certificates of licence to relate traditions, among them Ibn Mukbil. The last who gave him a certificate was as Salah-b-Abi Omar, but nevertheless he had made no profound study of all that I have alluded to. He then travelled to Fayytim, Damietta, al Mahallah and other places and took down in writing what he had heard from those who professed versification, as al Muhyi’d- din-b-Saki’yah and al A’la-b-u’l Janadi al Hanafi. Thence to Mecca by sea in Rabii’ II, 69 and studied a little under al Muhyi’ddin A’bdu’l Kadir al MA4liki and profited by the assistance of our friend Ibn Fadhl§ among others, and more than one granted him a licence to teach and instruct. Al A’lam al Bulki’ni granted him his encouragement until he obtained the chair of jurisprudence in the Shaykhiniyah mosque which had come down to him from his father and was present with him at some conferences therein. Then he held himself aloof|| and affected the airs of a Shaykh and applied himself to the sciences suitable to that profession. Moreover at the time when he used constantly to visit me, he carried off many of my compositions such as JLaU rm vod | flax) | ~ >‰॥ (+ 9। pt gs ४५८ - (५१४ wy, and others I need not enumerate. Nay he took * T’zzu’ddfn Mubammad-b-Sharafu’ddin Abi Bakr, born 759 (1358), died 819 (1416). Ibid. + As Suy4ti means to say that he owed much of solace in his toil to the bounty of as Sakhéwi. ~ Ahmad-b-Muhammad, born 798, died 887. Meurs. { The Héfidh, author of a work entitled Durrar as Sunniyah wa Bahiyah, a treatise on Muhammadan law, composed 855 A. प, D’Herb. | Meursinge does not find the 7th form this verb Oo! and translates it ‘omnes collegit vires suas.’ Lane gives the form and example elt w* oe ‘he withdrew himself from men.’ | xm | from the books of the Mahmidi’yah College and elsewhere, many ancient compositions which were unknown to many of his contemporaries, on various sciences, altered them slightly, transposed them and gave them out as his own, and prefaced them with pretentious introductions from which the unlearned reader might expect much, but not a part of which was fulfilled. The first he produced was a paper on the interdiction of the science of logic which he had extracted from a work of Ibn Taymiyah and in the greater part of it he was indebted to my assistance. Upon this many eminent scholars opposed him and even al A’lam al Bulkini rejected him and took from him what he had dictated to him in his lectures on this question, and had it not been for my good offices with a number of these, such as al Anbasi,* Ibn u’l Falati and Ibn Kasim,t the result would have been disastrous. He also lectured to a number of the common people in the mosque of Abmad-b-Talun ; moreover he acquired a predominancef over some who were themselves good for nothing, so that this was the means of his being favoured by his executor Shihdb-u’ddin-b-u’t Tabbikh who provided for his being brought up under Barsabai§ Comptroller of the Household. After this he attached himself to In4l al Ashkar,|| president of the order of prefects] until that personage appointed him professor of tradition in the Shaykhuniyah College after the death of the Shaykh Othm4n 9] Maksi, notwithstanding he had left a son. He was also appointed to the post of lecturer on the Sahihayn of al Bukhari and Muslim although he was unable to fulfil the condition attached to those offices by the endower,** * A’bdu’r Rahim-b-Ibréhim-b-Hajj4j Zaynu’ddin al Anbési, as Shéfi’i, born 829, died 891. M. † Muhammad-b-K4sim-b-A’li Shamsu’ddin al Maksi as Shéfi’i, born 817, died 893. ‡ I differ from M. in the translation of this passage. He would omit the second न ws gs in prem le gle jbo, 1 would retain it and read the first न or perhaps cyl! His rendering of 29 as ^^ pupillus” is, I think, inadmissible. § Probably Barsabai al Bajashi. See Weil. Gesch. Abb. Cal. Eg. II, p. 313. ॥ 181 al Ashkar az Zahiri. Mention of him is made by Weil first in the reign of Sultén Khush Kadam in 867 (1462) when he was Atabek of Aleppo. In the reign of al Malik al Ashraf Kaitbai, he was transferred from the government of Malatiyah to that of Aleppo, pp. 307, 333. @ See Carlyle’s edit. of the Maured allatéfat (Cantabrig 1792) for this title. Note 7, p. 41. * 9 What those conditions were is mentioned in the Husn al Muhbddbirah in de- scribing the foundation of the Amir Shaykhu. It was begun in Muharram 756 (Jan. Feb. 1355). Chairs were appointed for the four orthodox doctrinal schools, a chair of Tradition, of Kurdén reading, lectures (ghow! ) on the Sabihayn and the Shifa’, [ xi |] and to lecture on Mysticism at the Mausoleum of Barkuk* governor of Syria, which is by the gate of al Karafah at Cairo, through the favour of his townsman Abu Tayyib as Suyitti, and to other posts, All this, though he was not fitted for those offices nor nearly so, and for this reason it was said proverbially, that he undertook what he was not qualified to perform. He then gave a loose to his tongue and his pen against 018 Shaykhs who were his superiors, even to saying of Kadhi Adhud that he was not of as much consequence as a prick in the foot of Ibn u’s Salah, and for this he was reproved by one of the Hanabalite vice-presidents in the presence of their Kadhi. He also disparaged as Sayyidt and ar Radhi on a point of grammar without sufficient foundation, so that he withdrew his statement to a stranger who, when he met him, said, “ verily thou assertest that the Sayyid al Jurjdni maintains that a letter (.5,>){ intrinsically hath no meaning either inherent in it or otherwise, but this statemeat of the Sayyid’s testifieth to the falsehood of what thou dost allege.” He replied, “verily I have seen no statement of his to that effect, but when I was at Mecca, I conversed witha distinguished person on this subject, he told me what I have asserted and I relied upon his authority.”” The other answered, “it is strange how any one who is an author himself could depend upon such a statement in connection with such a 10848061." Thus far this assertion. He also said that any one who read with ar Radhi and his grammatical teaching, had never reached such a degree of proficiency as to entitle him to be called moderately acquainted with grammar. He continued thus displaying his presumption till he declared him- self profoundly versed in the seven sciences. § He further maintained that if all the learned men of the time were to propound thousands of questions to him, he could answer them all by the sole exercise of his reasoning powers, and were he to 866 them but a tenth part of the same, they would be unable to solve them. He likewise elaborated a work to facilitate the acquisition of the degree of Mujtahid|| The head professor who lectured on Mysticism and the Hanafite theology, was required to be the most learned Hanafite in Egypt, and to be profoundly versed in exegesis and the fundamentals of jurisprudence, and was not to be a K4dhi, and this condition was a general one for all the salaried College officials. * Consult D’Herb. art. Barkok, and Weil. Gesch. Abb. Cal. Eg. 510 seg. ¶ Abu’l Hasan A’li-b-Muhammad Zaynu’ddin al Husayni al Jurjéni known as as Sayyid as Sharif, died 816. Meurs. ‡ “3y™ has two senses grammatically speaking, one a letter, the other a particle, 9 ¢. what is used to express a meaning and is not a noun ora verb. See Lane. § Here follows an extract from as Suyuti’ which has already been translated in the preceding autobiography. ॥ This term is employed to denote a doctor who exerts all his capacity for the purpose of forming a right opinion upon a legal question. The title was common in [ xiv ] in order to assert his own claim to it. And how well spoke one of the professors of arithmetic,— that which he hath confessed* regarding himself in order that it might be inferred that he was impartial, 18 a proof of his dullness and lack of understanding from the testimony of masters of this science that it is one needing quick intelligence.” And similar to this is the saying of some one that he claimed the rank of Mujtahid to hide his own errors. And to this effect also, are his own words when a certain distinguished person met him and desired to confer with him on some point, “it cannot be that my store of knowledge in scholastic theology is of small account.”’ The following speech was made to him by another—“ inform me regarding the means of acquiring the degree of Mujtadhid. Is there any one living conversant with them?” He replied, ‘‘ Yes, there are those who have some knowledge of them, but they are not collectively united in one person but dispersed among a number.’ The other rejoined, “ tell me who they are, and we will bring them together for thee, and thou shalt speak with them, and if each one of them confesseth that thou hast a knowledge of his subject and noteth thee as distinguished therein, it is possible that we may allow thy शभरा." And he was silent and uttered not a word. He mentions that his compositions number more than 800 volumes, but I have seen some of them consisting only of one page, and those that are less than a ^^ kurrdsah”f are numerous. He mentions amongst them 8 commentary on the Shatibiyaht and the Alfiyah on the readings of the Kur4n, notwithstanding his own confession, as has already gone before, that he had studied them under no Shaykh. Among his writings, the following were fraudulently appropriated from the compositions of our Shaykh.§ wlaott AC = 4, lad} &s 9 RA ८ 4५८८ Vi + Ja pt law! ५७१ Sora ५.41 कण = god 9 Om ye) 029 26५ - द ० gM eae - ५०->+॥ glo cst plc ५,» Cpl} - wb US 69 ८9८19 219; (० - lait ८५५2-1} Slut er ४9 peat pte. SU + ५ CBU CALS = ७४-~०५॥ Lent + 55> (५ the first ages of शकष, but the principal points having been fixed by the great doctors, the exercise of private judgment in legal questions soon ceased to be recognized. Some later doctors like as Suydti claimed the title and the right, but both were refused to them by public opinion. See De Slane I. K. I. p. 201. * Alluding to as Suyiti’s disinclination to that stndy. ¶ A “kurrasah” according to De Slane (Vol. II, p. 98) generally contains 20 pages. ‡ See Note, p. 503 § Meursinge understands him to mean here, al Bulkini, as as Sakbdwi speake of him under this title ( 4" ) in his biography [ xv |] All these are the dissertations of our Shaykh, and would that he had not altered them when he appropriated them, for if he had given them as they were, it would have been more profitable. The works belonging to other authors also, among his compositions are numerous. This would be seen were all the works named at hand, but in any case, he was given to much arrogant boasting. He came to me once and asserted that he had read the Musnad of as 81401 with al Kamméasi, and of his own accord communicated to me what contained a falsehood in every part of it. In the same way he related on theauthority of al Kamal brother of al Jalal al Mahalli, a dream in which al Kamal proved his untruth. Al Badru’ddin the Hanbalite Kadhi said to me, “ I never saw him reading the Jama’ u’l Jawdmi’ with my Shaykh notwithstanding my constant zeal in attendance on him (the Shaykh) ; but indeed Khayru’ddin ar Rishi the Nakib studied it under him.” I said, ‘‘ perhaps he used to come at the same time.” He replied, “ I never observed 16." He asserted that he composed the Nafhat u’l Miskiyah wa’l Tubfat प्न Makkiyah (The Musky Fragrance and the Meccan gift) in one ‘ kurrdsah’ _ when he was at Mecca after the manner of the U’nwdn u’s Sharaf of Ibn u’l Mukri* in a single day, and that he wrote an Alfiyah on tradition superior to the Alfiyah ए] "क्षपित and other things which it would be tedious to mention. Similar to this is his saying (which verifies the adage that forgetfulness is the undoing of falsehood) in one place that he knew by heart a part of the Minhaéj on Fundamentals, and in another that he knew the whole of it, and that the course of Dictation was discontinued after the death of our Shaykh until he reinstated it. So too his assertion that the first who was appointed to the Shaykhdniyah College was al Kafiy4ji, and his remarking to me several times, “ by Allah, if the Turkish Superintendent had not appointed him, or had I alone to do in the affair, I would not have preferred him from my knowledge of the special claim of another.”’ Add to all this the inversions and solecisms in pronunciation that fell from him and what arose from his misapprehension of meaning, through his not frequenting the lectures of the learned nor attending their evening and nightly assemblies, instead of which he worked alone, deep among codices and tomes, and relied upon what had not secured the approval of accurate scholars ; moreover he was opposed by all men uni- versally when he claimed the degree of Mujtahid. He composed the following works: = (क | bas म) 7४ ५५.>=। | Bau gg? ७४.८॥ (९८८ - U9! wit ५८ suet ras - pi ore gle SI ~ eget gle % 4५ ५०० pH) - Usybi! abi * See note, p. 540. † Alfiyah पा T’raéki fi Usu’l u’l Hadith by the Hafidh Zaynu’ddin A’bdu'r Rahbfm-b-i’1 Husayn al I’r&ki: died 806 (1403). This and its commentaries are noticed at some length by H. K. [ xvi ] All this during his stay at Mecca, treating discourteously therein the people of Hijaz for which he richly deserved severe reproof, some of these compositions being more foul than others. Of these I have seen only the first which contains great disparagement of al Jaujari and much arrogance which in parts shows his folly, nay his rabid rage. The fourth is in refu- tation of al Burhan an Nudméni* where he reads the words of the Kadhi T’ydédh at the close of the Shifé कं lias? 9 in the dual number, after he had written him a paper containing hard and coarse language not proper to be addressed to scholars, which induced al Burhan to procure learned opinion upon it and those who wrote agreeing with his reading were al Amin al Iksirai, al U’bbadi, al Bami, az Zayn Késim al Hanafi, al Fakhr ad Dayyimi and the writer of this memoir. Al Burhan wrote a pamphlet which he entitled al Kaul al Mufasgal fi radd a’la’l Mughaffal. (A clear tractate in refutation of the tmbectle) ; moreover one of the disciples of al Jaujari wrote also in support of him but al Jaujarit was incensed against him who undertook this on account of the praise of the person eulogized that his work contained. As Suyuti also wrote a letter to al Kamal-b-Abi Sharif{ and filled it with unworthy attacks on al Kirméni. Al Khatib al Waziri sent his son to him at Raudhah§ to exhibit his proficiency in study, but he sent him back, alleging as an excuse that he did not fulfil his father’s description|| of him on certain points and that his letter for other reasons, likewise, was not satisfactory to him. * The Imém Héfidh Abu’! Fadhl I’y&dh-b-Misa Yahsabi, called as Sabti because he was a native of Ceuta. He was born in 470 (1077) died in 544 (1149). Among his best known works are a history of Cordova, a devotional work called Azhér पए Ryddh, and the Shifa (Note व p. vii). See his life in D’Herb. The words at the close of the Bhifé alluded to aro, (teste Meurs.) Sicler 9 sy 570) parad? as! 5 Et peculiarem nobis facere volet (Deus) peculiarem favorem turbce Prophets nostri ejusque agminis (9-2-25 is here an inf. n. of UO like wo and ५4 ed =" Burhdnu’ddin took it as a dual number. Weijers’ note on this in Meurs. is remarkable. Quo modo vero Burhanoddinus iste ibi in duali numero ... legere ... equidem plane non intelligo; et magis etiam miror partium studium eorum eruditorum, qui nuda, ut videtur, Sojati 1071018 ducti, Borhannodino illi adversus hunc adstipulati, aut certe illi non plane oblecuti sunt. t Muhammad-b-A’bdi’l Muni’m Shamsu’ddfn al Jaujari al Kéhiri as 80801: born 822 (1419) died 889 (1484). M. He was the author against whom was directed the first treatise mentioned in the last page. ‡ Abu’l Hané Muhammad al Kamalu’ddin-b-Abi Sharif as Shafi’'i: born 822 Meurs. § A place, according to Meursinge where 88 SuyGti had an estate. | I must differ from Meursinge’s rendering of this, ‘non posse se patri ejus (in responso suo) omnes quos oporteret titulos dare.”’ - { xvn ] When a certain student once spoke of the impiety of Ibn पा A’rabi,* he replied, “verily war 18 announcedt that shall come upon him from God, though the judge can find nought against him and he himself deprecates examipation of his writings for points which he judges orthodox in which the believer and discerner of true doctrine cannot concur with him.” More- over he reported of him that he said, ‘it is forbidden to examine my words.” As Suyiti was one of those who adopted this tenet (2 Ibn A’rabi’s) from A’bdu’llah Muhammad-b-Omar al Maghrabi who lived near the Kardkiha al Hasani College whose lectures he attended for some time. More might be said, but were I to discuss all that regarded him, I should transgress due limits. To be brief, he wrote hastily{ without reflection: I never knew him to be anything but vain and overweening, even towards his own mother, so that she used constantly to complain of him, and his conduct continued to grow worse in this respect,—may the Most High inspire him with rectitude. The Caliph favoured him and appointed him Shaykh of the Baybar- siyab College in succession to al Jalal al Bakri,§ after which his zeal abated, nay became congealed, so that he sought retirement from the world according to what he himself says, “I gave up lecturing and resolving cases of law and turned myself to the Most High.” Before this time he asserted that he had a dream in which the prophet upbraided him, and his Vicegerent as Siddik ordered him to be imprisoned for a year, that he might revert to lecturing and expounding the law when he took it upon himeelf to abandon them, and that he asked pardon and desisted from his purpose: so that if any one came to him with a case, though he were * Muhyiddin-b-A’li a most voluminous writer on Sufiism, a native of Murcia: born 560 (1165), died 638 (1240). Consult Haj. Khal and the Tabakét al Mufass. of as Suyitti, edit, Meurs. also De Slane. I. इ, Vol. IV, p. 351. In Suyati’s notice of him it is stated that some of his expressions were not altogether orthodox and that though outwardly confirming to the faith, he had some peculiar views on doctrine, but ad Dahabi excuses him on the ground that his writings on Sufiism and his austeri- ties, had disturbed his intellect, and he imagined things that had no existence. See also D’Herb. art. Arabi. ¶† Referring to Kur. ITI, ८...) 3 BUI ps0 (५ 19.319 (be apprized of war that shall come upon you from God and his apostle.) Meaning, * you threaten him with war from God on account of his impiety, though the temporal judge can find nothing to substantiate the charge; and he himself deprecates examination of his writings to prove him unorthodox by wresting his words from their proper sense.” The Arabio of this passage is obscure and probably corrupt. ‡ I cannot concur in Meursinge’s translation ^ Et hoc celeriter describi potest.” { A’bdu’l Baka Muhammad-b-A’bdi’r Rahman ad Dahrati, known as Jalélu’ddin al Bakri; born 807 (1404), died 891 (1486). M. The Caliph who appointed him must have been al Mutawakkil ’ala’Udb Abu’! "ब्द who died in 903. = ५ [ xvii J about to drown at the time, he would take it to write his decision thereon. It was not long after this, that he said what has gone before. Al Muhyi’ddin-b-u’l Mughayzil left him when he experienced from him great ill-treatment, after he had acted towards him previously, with generosity and he has related instances of his extravagant pretensions which the circumstances themselves verify. As an example, he requested al Burhénu’ddin al Karaki to appoint him to conduct a judicial case which was under his charge. The latter complied and on his own part furnished in addition a duplicate of the original process. As Suydti went to him accompanied by al A’lamu’ddin Sulaymén al Khalifati to take it, and he never thanked him nor uttered a word expressive of his obligation. He on one occasion related to Muhyi’ddin after as Sunbati’s death, a circum- stance showing his injustice. He said, “why hast thou told me of this only after his death?” As Suydti replied, ‘that thou mayest know the hearts of men.” And this notwithstanding his great kindness to him, especially during the time of the high prices when there was a dearth of bread and food in the Shaykhuniyah, and he used to give him a dinar weekly as he states himself. In the same way a certain Turk left him, whom from a Hanafite he had made a Shafi’ite, notwithstanding that as Suytti bad begun by showing great kindness and courtesy towards him. Al Maghrabi likewise abandoned him, the same who used to assert his great sanctity, and also al Fath al Karni.* An instance of his arrogance, is his saying to one of his attendants, “‘ when I receive the office of KAdhi, I will appoint thee to such and euch a thing, nay thou shalt obtain every thing.” Subsequently in the year 898, the Shaykh Abu’n Najé sont of Shaykh Khalaf opposed him and publicly exposed his deficiencies and faults, and he was humbled by him and greatly abased. The Imém al Karaki spoke highly of Abu’n Naja as I have fully shown in the Hawéa- dith.{ Previously to this as Suyiti wrote a work entitled, “the Cautery in refutation of as Sakhawi,” in which he opposed what is affirmed in the Sahih,§ although I never touched upon the subject save some time before, * Meursinge conceives that these were all instances of persons who were at first attached to as Suytti but were afterwards driven from him by his violence and harsh- ness. ¢ Abu'n Naja-b-Khalaf al Misri as Shéfi’i, born 849. He used to hold assem- 21168 in the mosques and other public places to which he drew large numbers even from the quarters where as Suyati lived, and even lectured in Suyiti’s own college the Baybarsiyah. M. note 183, p. 43. ‡ Meursinge supposes that this is the name of a book (De rebdus gestis) by as Sakhaéwi but of which no mention is made by H4ji Khalifah. § Meursinge translates asm | क ‘inter vera.” I understand Sab te signify the authentic traditions that are known under that name. [ xix ] nay my course towards it having been to speak neither in affirmation or denial. Let us praise God the Distributer of understanding.”’ The Compiler* adds, “The Sult4én al A’ddil Timéni Bdit removed him from the post of professor of the Baybarsiyah on Monday the 12th Rajab 906 (15८ February 1501) when a number of the Sufi Shaykhs of the Madrassah held a meeting against him on account of his niggardliness with them and his hostility to them by depriving many of them of their stipends and appointing others thereto. He received many humiliations such as judicial mandates, annoyances, interdictions: and other similar things occurred. In the professorship after him was appointed Laishin al Bilbisi, known as Ibn u’l Ballan, on Monday the 26th of the said month, although there were others superior to him in desert, but fortune prevails over merit. Yet he was in no way at ease, fearful lest Jaldlu’ddin (ae Suyufi) should disturb him by assarting that al A’Adil had forced him publicly to forego his right. And indeed this move of al Jalalu’ddin actually took place though not persisted in, and thus the position of al Bilbisi was insecure. After this Jalalu’ddin’s affairs became tranquil and he turned aside from this office and that of professor of tradition in the Shaykhiu- niyah with a view to a life of withdrawal from worldly affairs, and he broke off all connection with society by residing at Raudhah, and I have heard that a number of the principal nobles used to visit him whom he did not rise to greet. The professorship of the Baybarsfyah was offered to him on the death of al Bilbisi on Saturday the 25th of Dil Hijjah 909, but he declined it and al Kamalu’ddin at Tawil assumed it on Monday the 27th of the said month after he had expended largely, itis said, on that account. Jaldlu’ddin continued in retirement till he died on Thursday the 18th Jumada I, 911 (17th October 1505). May the Lord have mercy upon him and upon us.” Having now given as Sakh4wi’s strictures on as Suyuti, I cannot in justice refrain from presenting to the reader the latter’s opinion of his critic, and for this Iam indebted to Meursinge who has extracted the follow- ing notice from a work of the historian’s, entitled who} +| y whs¥) whey (the choicest of the great and sons of the Age), Cod. 416th, p. 94. «५ Muhammad-b-A’bdi’r Rahman-b-Muhammad-Abi Bakr-bsOthm4n- b-Muhammad as Sakhawi Shamsu’ddin, the traditionist, the historian, the calumniator, was born in 831 (1427-8) and attended while he was yet young, the dictations of the Hafidh Ibn Hajr who fostered in him a love of the science of tradition. He frequented his classes and wrotg out * The word cals here indicates the termination of as Sakhéwi’s narrative and that what follows is by the author who has extracted it. t One of the Circassian Mamelukes who reigned three years anda half, 906-9 (150 1-3). M. [ x ] many of his compositions with his own hand. He studied under very many collectors of traditions in Egypt, Syria and Hijaz and he selected and extracted them for himself and for others, notwithstanding his mis- reading of them and his being destitute of all knowledge, so that he was good for nothing but in the mere science of tradition. Then he fell upon history and dissipated his life therein and devoted all his efforts to it, and lacerated therein the reputations of men and filled it with their misdeeds, and all that had been imputed to them whether true or false, and asserted that he was thus doing anecessary duty, viz., apportioning blame or praise, whereas this is manifest folly and error and blasphemy against God. Moreover he was guilty of a fragrant violation of right and was under the burden of many sins, as I have shown in the preface to this book. I mention this only that no one may be seduced by him or trust to any thing that is in his historical writings defamatory of men, especially the learned, or pay heed thereunto. He died in Shaa’ban 902.” (April 1497.) The Leyden copy of the work from which this is taken, Meursinge believes to be the only one existing in Europe, and he proposed to himself to treat further of it on some future occasion as it contains memoirs more or less full, of the distinguished men of as Suytti’s age. Whether he ever fulfilled his intentions I do not know, and am therefore unable to give further particulars regarding the irregularities alluded to at the close of the above extract. This is, however, of little importance. The recrimi- nations of authors are little to their credit, and are read with indifference when the passions and jealousies which evoked them are hushed and forgotten. The supplement to as Sakh4wi’s narrative bears unwilling evidence of the reverence in which as Suylti was held at a time when, retired from the world, he still received the unsolicited visits of the great. His petulant notice of the historian’s just criticism of Burhanu’ddin’s reading of the Shifé of Kadhi I’yadh, and the evident jealousy which induced the learned referees to side with Burhan, his hints of the dis- approval with which Bulkini and Mundwi regarded our author who never- theless speaks of them in his Husn al Muhddhirah in terms of unqualified esteem, sufficiently prove the unfairness and suggest the untruthfulness of the writer. His rancour against the historian was probably caused by as Suytti’s criticism of his work the Dhu’l Lami’, in his pamphlet entitled the Cautery, and the name not indistinctly hints that the iron was applied red hot. Possibly previous differences may have made his duty a grateful one, and a critique undertaken in this spirit, would not be altogether just. The angry retort of his patient, however, inflicted as keen a wound as 16 ` received and the passing satisfaction of an incisive and now forgotten criticism, was more than avenged by the immortality of his victim’s reply. [ xxi ] The length to which these hitherto little known particulars of as Suyititi’s life have unavoidably led me, precludes any extended notice of the work which is here presented to the public. The sources whence the author derived the materials for his history are indicated by him at its close, and if their treatment does not discover any evidence of originality of design, it has at least the merit of condensing into a readable compass, not only the principal events which occurred during the reign of each Caliph, but the personal details and sketches of court life and manners which are often wanting in Abu’l Fida but which lend their chief interest to the lively narrative of Masa’idi. To the dignity of a history according to the European acceptation of the term, it has indeed no pretensions. To investigate the relations of cause and effect, to trace the growth and deve- lopment of communities and assign the reasons of their arrestation or decline, to discuss the social, political and religious questions which disturb the tranquillity or affect the fortunes of states, to analyze the characters of public men and the influences which bear on their conduct ; to paint vivid descriptions of battle-scenes and pageantries of state; to survey the arts, manufactures, trades and products of a country and all that constitutes and adorns its national life, this ideal epic of poetry and philosophy, no Eastern historian has ever attempted. Historical science in its infancy among the Moslems as De Slane has shown, began with oral traditions transmitted from one HA&fidh to another, together with the series of authorities for each independent fact, till their accumulated store became too burdensome for retention by memory. They were then committed to writing in the form of a collection of statements supported by lines of ascription reaching to the original narrators who were in most cases eye- witnesses of what they related. A subsequent writer suppressed the ascriptions to a large extent, marshalled the facts and blended the discon- nected traditions into one continuous but bulky history. Such were Ibn u’l Athir and at Tabari. Then came the abridger who condensed the work of his predecessor into a simpler and smaller volume while the greater work was consigned to veneration and decay in some public library. Such were Abu’l Fida and as Suyiiti. De Slane has, I think, unfairly censured these last-mentioned writers. He considers them to have done nearly as much injury to their predecessors as Justin and Florus have done to Livy and Tacitus. I do not admit the justness of the parallel nor perceive its relevancy. Justin’s history, is a compilation of extracts rather than an abridgment of the lost books of Trogus Pompeius whose guides were exclusively Greek, and who treated in the main but with voluminous digres- sions, of the rise, decline and fall of the Macedonian monarchy. Though Justin has been censured for omitting much from his original that was worthy of record, yet that original was professedly not Tacitus, whose [ xx |] Histories and Annals are concerned with the period between the second consulship of Galba and the death of Domitian, and from the death of Augustus to the death of Nero. It is true that the Editio Princeps of Florus published about 1471, bore the title, “Titi Livii Epithoma,’”’ but it is not regarded by modern scholars as an abridgment of Livy, but a compilation from various authorities epitomizing the leading events from the building of the city to the rise of the Empire. The Epitomes of the books of Livy have been ascribed to Florus, and with equal probability to Livy himself. There is no internal testimony in favour of either conclu- sion, and external evidence is altogether wanting.* It is difficult, therefore to perceive in what way the assumed injury has been affected. The paral- lel applied to the Hasterns fails in a similar manner. Their merit would perhaps be slight, were it confined to their condensation, however judicious, of a single work, but this is far from being the case. Abu’l Fida cites no less than fourteen authors, and as Suyitti, twelve, to whose voluminous pages they are indebted for their materials. The greater number of the works which they mention have perished, and it is to their labours we owe the preservation of much that would otherwise have been irretrievably lost. Reiske’s eloquent commendation of Abu’l Fida is a just and sufficient testimony to his eminence, and his concluding words will suffice me for any panegyric of as Suyuti,—ipse usus eum commendabit, quare laudibus ejus celebrandis parcam. The MSS. from which the text of this work was edited, which is but ~ ~ 006 among the many services of the accomplished Orientalist Colonel Nassau Lees to the world of letters, were the following— M ‘atin a to Maulvie Muhammad Wajih, Head Professor of the Calcutta.Madrassah: this copy is now missing , the property 0 ulvie Abd’us Shukir of Jounpore. Likewise missing. » in the possession of क" Asiatre_Society, Calcutta. This latter is the only one with which I have ‘heen able to collate the text Another MS. is mentioned by Weil in his history of the Abbaside Caliphs in Egypt (note, p. 122, Vol. IF,) and numbered Cod Goth. N. 321, which I have not seen The system of transliteration of Arabic proper names adopted by me is the same now in general use throughout India. The folowing letters alone present any difficulty, and are thus represented : व * Consult. Ramsay’s art, on Livy in William Smith, Cl. D. \ ~ ४ \ ५ ४, { xxiii J ट is written h 5 99 d ६ 99 8 ८० 9 dh + ् t # 9 dh 4 ४ with a comma over the vowel. Some proper names of persons, such as Omar and Othman, and those of certain towns and countries, the corrupt spelling of which has been consecrated and fixed by custom, are left unaltered, In concluding, I have to acknowledge my indebtedness to Maulvie Kabiruddin Ahmad whose wide range of reading and intelligent acquain- tance with the historical, philosophical and doctrinal literature of the Arabs have been of great service to me. In what pertains to the accuracy of the translation and the manner of it, I must leave to the criticism of the learned, the correction and removal of defects in both, of which I am only too conscious, but which with the best endeavours, I have failed to amend. H. 8. J. HISTORY OF THE CALIPHS, BY JALALUDDIN A’S SUYUTI. ~~ After the praises of God, of Him who promises and performs, and who threatens and forgives,—and blessings and peace upon our Chief, Muhammad, Prince of the nobly born, progenitor of the Caliphs—and upon his family and Companions, the possessors of magnanimity and good faith, I proceed to give in this slight historical sketch, a biographical account of the Caliphs, the Princes of the Faithful, who have stood in authority over the people from the age of Abu Bakr the Witness to the ‘Truth—may God approve him—up to this my time, according to the order of their reigns one after another. And I have mentioned in the lives of all them, the remarkable occurrences which happened during the reign of each, and the chief doctors of the faith, and the illustrious personages who lived during their time. Many circumstances instigated the composition of this work: among them, that a collection of the biographies of the chiefs of the faith, and those endowed with virtue, was desirable and would be welcome, and in truth, there are those who have compiled histories in which they have introduced these distinguished men, but unsystematically, and without giving a full account of them, and their completion would entail prolixity and weariness. For this reason I was desirous of separately detailing each class of men in a work apart, which would be more advantageous for those who wished for particulars of any one class, and easier to consult. Thus I have set apart one book for the prophets—upon whom be the benediction and peace of God,—and another for the Companions of the Prophet ; abridged from the ^ [इ of the Shaykhu’l Islim Ibn Hajr ;—and another comprising the various commentators of the Kuran; and an 1 [ 2 ] . eo dhideed work on the lives of the Huffadh,* epitomized from the Tabakat ०,.०. ad Dababi ; and a voluminous work on the grammarians and philologists, any: suhhijay to which had not been before composed; and a book on those learned in the fundamentals of the faith,—and a voluminous work on those famed for sanctity ; and another on the doctors of the Law of Inheritance; and another on Rhetoricians ; and another on Writers, that is, authors of prose composition ; and another on those celebrated for cal- ligraphy ;f and another on the Arab poets whose works are authori- ties in the language, and these comprehend the greater number of eminent men of the nation. I rest: satisfied, regarding doctors of Law, with what other men have written on that subject, on account of its abundance, and independence of any further informatin thereon,—and I have likewise contented myself with what the Tabakat of ad Dahabift contains on the Readers of the पाषा. The Kadhis are included among the preceding, and therefore, among personages of distinction, the history of the Caliphs alone remains unwritten, notwithstanding the eagerness of men for accounts of them. I have therefore set apart this book for them but have not included in it, any who disputed the Caliphate by force of arms, and did not succeed to power, such as many of the descendants of Ali and afew of the House of Abbas: neither have I made mention of any of the Caliphs, the descen- dants of Ubayd-u’llah,§ because their authority was illegal for many reasons—among them—this, that they were not of the tribe of the Kur- aysh, and although the ignorant vulgar have named them Fatimites, * A Hafidh or one who remembers what he has heard or read, is of the 3rd grade of the Traditionists. Of those there are five. The Hafidh must know 300,000 tradi- tions by heart, and be able to name the lines of authorities of each.' Consult Ibn-Salah on tradition. + The Khattu’l] Mansib is a species of handwriting, the invention of which is attributed by Ibn Khall (see life of al-Bawwab) to Abu Abdullah al-Hasan brother of Ibn Muklah, while ad Dahabi (Tarikhu’l Islam) gives the credit of it to the latter. See De Slane’s notes on this handwriting. Art. Ibn al Aamidi the Kadhi. ‡ Abu Abdu’llah Muhammad a doctor of the 81891 school, surnamed the ‘sun of religion’ born at Damascus A. H. 678, (1275) but his ancestors were Turkoman. He was the chief Hafidh and Kurén reader of Syria. His works are very numerous. The Tabakét there mentioned is a biography of the Readers of the Kurén. See Ibn Khall. § The founder of this house was Ubaydu'llah al Mahdi who assumed the Caliphate in 296 A. H. (A. D. 908). At the same period Abdu’llah was Caliph in Spain, and Al Muktadir at Baghdad: ‘In the 10th century” says Gibbon “ the chair of Mahomed was disputed by three Caliphs who reigned at Baghdad, Cairoan and Cordova, excommunicated cach other and agreed ina principle of discord that a sectary is morc odious and criminal than an unbeliever.” [ $ ] nevertheless their ancestor was a worshipper of fire. Kadhi Abdu’l Jabbdér of Basrah says that the name of the ancestor of the Egyptian Caliphs was Said and his father was a Jew blacksmith of Salamiyah.* The Kadhi Abu Bakr al Bakilanit says that al Kaddah the grandfather of Ubaydu’llah, called al Mahdi, was a fire-worshipper, and Ubaydu’llah went to Africa and asserted that he was a descendant of Ali; none of the genealogists recognised him as such, but ignorant people called them Fatimites. । Ibn Khallakan remarks that most of the learned did not hold as valid, the pedigree of Ubaydu’llah al Mahdi, the ancestor of the Egyptian Caliphs, insomuch that when al Aziz bi’ll4h son of al Miuizz in the be- ginning of his reign, ascended the pulpit on a Friday, he found there a piece of paper, and in it these lines— ‘We have heard a false pedigree Read from the pulpit in the mosque. If thou art truly what thou assertest, Then name thy ancestor up to the fifth{ generation. And if thou mean to verify what thou sayest Then give us thy pedigree like that of at Taia.§ If not, then leave thy pedigree in obscurity And enter with us into a common ancestry For the genealogies of the sons of Hashim To them aspires not the desire of the ambitious. Al Aziz wrote to the Umayyad,|| then ruler of Spain, a letter in which he reviled and satirized him, whereupon the Umayyad replied, saying, “ After the usual greetings, verily thou knewest me, therefore hast thou satirized me, and surely if I knew thee, I would answer thee :”” and this came sorely upon al Aziz and silenced him from reply, for it,meant that he was an im- postor and his family unknown. * The printed edition has (८4) an arrow-maker—the MS. has 4ssale of Sulaymiah—the latter is probably a copyist’s error for 49७ a small town in tho district of Enessa where according to.Ibn Khallakaén Al Mahdi was born—I have preferred the latter reading. † Called Bakiléni or vendor of beans. He was of Basrah but long resident in Baghdad and celebrated as a doctor of scholastic theology a voluminous author, died A. ए, 403 (1019 A. D.). Ibn Khall. { The text and MS. have ew instead of |) ~ Itis clear from Ibn Khal- lakan that the former is incorrect as al Aziz was fifth in descent from al Mahdi. ९ A cotemporary of al Aziz. At Taialillah reigned as Caliph at Baghdad in A. H. 363 (A. D. 913) a lineal descendant from Hashim great-grandfather of Mu- hammad. || This must have been either Hakam or Hishém called al Mustansir. Hakam died one year after the acccssion of al Aziz and was succeeded by Hisham al Muayyad. | 4 | Ad Dahabi says that authorities are agreed upon this, that Ubayd- u’llah al Mahdi was not a descendant of Ali; and how well spoke his grand- son al Mizz, the ruler of Cairo, when Ibn Tabataba,* the descendant of Ali questioned him regarding their origin! He half drew his sword from the scabbard and said “ This is my pedigree,” and scattering gold among the nobles and those who were present, said “here are the proofs of my nobility.” And among the reasons aforesaid is this, that the greater number of them were Magians, beyond the pale of Islam; and there were of them, some who reviled the prophets, and among them some who held the use of wine lawful, and some of them commanded worship unto themselves, and the best of them were heretics, unclean and base, who directed the execra- tion of the Companions of the prophet—may God approve them—and to such as these, homage is not binding and their headship is illegal. And Abu Bakr al Bakilani says that Ubaydu’llah al Mahdi, was a vile Batini,t eager for the subversion of the orthodox faith. He persecuted learned men and doctors of law, that he might be able to seduce the people, and his descendants followed his ways. They gave a license to wine and for- nication and promulgated heresy. Ad Dahabi says that al Kaéim the son of al Mahdi, was more wicked than his father, an accursed Magian, who openly reviled the prophets, and he adds that the House of Ubaydu’llah was more malevolent towards the Orthodox faith than the Tartars. Abu’l Hasan al Kabasif says that Ubaydu’llah and his descendants put to death four thousand of the learned and pious, seeking to turn them from acknowledging the Companions of the prophet, but they preferred death—then, well indeed, had he been only a heretic but he was a Magian. (Zindik.) § The Kadhi Iyadh tells us that|| Abu Muhammad al Kayruwani, al * Abu Muhammad Abdu’llah 9th in descent from Ali, a native of Hijaz but an inhabitant of Egypt. He was a Sharif noted for the nobility of his character, his vast possessions and the style in which he lived, born A. H. 286 (A. D. 899) and died 4th Rajab at Cairo A. H. 348 (September A. D. 959). Ibn Khall. † This is the same sect as the Assassins so often mentioned in the history of the Crusades, founded by Hasan Saba, known asthe Old Man of the Mountain. The word signifies possessing inward light and knowledge. Sec Von Hammer-Gesch-dor Assassinen. ‡ A doctor of the Maliki school. A great Traditionist—died A. H. 403, (A. D. 1012.) Ibn Khall. § This term primarily implies an assertor of the doctrine of Dualism, but it is also used to signify an atheist or one who denies the world to come and maintains the eter- nity of tho present. Consult. Lane. art (39) De Sacy, Chresth. Ar. 2nd Kd. II. p. 274. | Abu’l Fadhl Iyadh a traditionist—the greatest authority of his age on Arabic history and literaturo. He was educated at Cordova and died in Morocco—A. H. 544 (A. D. 1160). Ibn Khall. La + Kizani, one of the doctors of the Maliki school was asked as to the case of one compelled by the House of Ubayd, namely, the Caliphs of Egypt—to acknowledge their claims or die. He replied “he must choose death and no one can be excused in such an instance : their assumption of authority at first took place before their pretensions were understood, but afterwards flight was imperative and no one through fear of death could excuse his voluntary abiding, forasmuch as residence in a place, the people of which are required to abandon the religious precepts of Js/am is not permissible ; nevertheless some few doctors of law did remain exceptionally for them, lest ¢ knowledge of their religious ordinances might be wanting to the Muslims and the rulers seduce them from their faith.” And Yusuf ur Ruayni says that the learned of Kayruwan were agreed. that the House of Ubayd were in the condition of apostates and Magians, for they declared openly against the law. Ibn Khallakan remarks as follows: “Verily they laid claim to the knowledge of hidden things, and accounts of them regarding this are well-known, for when al Aziz one day, ascended the pulpit, he observed a piece of paper in which was written— Verily we are patient under tyranny and oppression But not under infidelity and folly ; If thou art gifted with the knowledge of what is hidden Reveal to us the writer of this letter. A woman, also, once addressed to him a petition in which was written: «४ By Him who hath exalted the Jews through Misha* and the Christians through Ibn Nastur, and hath disgraced the true believers in thee, see that thou look into my case,’ and Misha the Jew was intendant of the finances in Syria and Ibn Nastur in Egypt. Among other reasons is this, that their assumption of the Caliphate, occurred at a time when an Abbasi Imam was already in possession with priority of allegiance ; it was therefore illegal, for a covenant of fealty to two Imams at the same time cannot be justified, and the first is the right- ful one. And again there is a tradition to this effect, that this authority when it shall come into the possession of the children of Abbas, shall not depart from them, until they themselves shall resign it unto Jesus the Son of Mary, or al Mahdi.f It is therefore ascertained that whosoever assumes the Caliphate during their incumbency is a schismatic and a rebel. For these reasons therefore, I have made no mention of any of the House of Ubayd, nor of other schismatics but only of the Caliphs who unite orthodoxy of headship and a covenant of allegiance. * Tho readings of the MS. vary in both places where this name occurs. t+ The last of the Imams who it is belicved, will appear before the Day of Judg- ment, to overthrow Dajjil—the Man of Sin that is to come, [ 6 ] I have prefaced the beginning of the book with a few chapters, con- taining observations of importance and what I have introduced of strange and remarkable occurrences, is taken from the history of the Hafidh-ad Dahabi, and the responsibility for his own work is upon him, and the Lord is my helper. In explanation of how the prophet left no successor and the mystery of this.* Al-Bazzarf in his Musnad (collection of traditions) states on the authority of Hudayfah{ that the Companions of the prophet said: O! Apostle of God, wilt thou not appoint a successor unto us?’’ He replied, “Verily did I appoint a successor over you, and were you to rebel against the successor appointed by me, punishment would come upon you.”’ The two Shaykhs§ have recorded regarding Omar that he said when he was stabbed. ‘ Were I to name a successor, then, verily, he named a successor, who was greater than I,” (meaning Abu Bakr,) “and were I to leave you without one, then, verily, he also hath left you so, who was greater than I,” (meaning the Apostle of God). | Ahmad and al Bayhaki|| in their Proots of Prophecy, have related on good authority from Amar-b-Sufyan, that when Ali was victorious on the day of the Camel,{ he said, ‘““O! men, verily the Apostle of God hath committed nothing unto us in regard to this authority, in order that we might of our own judgment approve and appoint Abu Bakr, who ruled and so continued until he went bis way; then Abu Bakr thought fit to nominate Omar who ruled and so continued until the right became estab- * As the mention of the lines of authoritics for each tradition is of no profit to the general reader, they will be omitted, the first and last alone being given. † Abu Bakr Muhammad Ibn Abdu’l Baki, surnamed the Kadhi of the infirmary, a great traditionist—flourished about A. D. 1123. The MS. has al Bazziz of whom I can find no notice as traditionist but only asa teacher of Kurain reading. Another al Bazz4r is Abu Bakr Muhammad Abdu’llah-b-Ibrahim—a Shffiite doctor, author of the Ghiléniyat, died A. H. 354. { Abu Abdu’llah-b-u’l Yaman, one of the companions died A. D. 656. 260 Hajar. § Al Bukhari and Muslim, the two greatest of the six highest authorities on tra- dition—the other are at Tirmidi, Abu Daudd, an Nasi and Ibn Maja. || Abu Bakr-b-al-Husayn called al Bayhaki from his birthplace near Naysabiur an eminent traditionist born 384 (994) died 458 (1066). Ibn Khall, ¶ The battle so called from the camel ridden by Aysha when defeated and taken prisoner by Ali under the walls of Basrah A. D. 66. See Gibbon, Vol. VI. p. 275. Kd. Mil. [ 7 ] lished.* Then the people sought worldly advantages and events occurred regarding which may the Lord determine.” Al Hakim in his,Mustadrak has recorded, and al Bayhaki has confirmed it in his “ Proofs’ on the testimony of Abu Wail, that it was asked of Ali. ^ Wilt thou not appoint a successor unto us?” He replied, “The Apostle of God appointed none, shall I therefore do so? but if God desireth the good of the people, He will unite them after me upon the best of themselves, as He united them after their prophet upon the best among them. Ad Dahabi remarks that among the heretics there are some idle tra- ditions that the prophet bequeathed the Caliphate to Ali, and verily Huzayl-b-Shurahbilf says, ^ Did Abu Bakr obey Ali, the legatee of the apostle of God? Abu Bakr would have been glad to have received the bequest from the apostle of God, for then he would have forced Ali to submit.” Ibn Sadd§ has recorded on the authority of Hasan that Ali said, “ When the apostle of God died, he deliberated upon our mode of govern- ment, and we found that the prophet had made Abu Bakr take the lead in public prayers. We approved, therefore, for our temporal affairs one whom the apostle of God approved for our spiritual concerns. We thus gave precedence to Abu Bakr.” Al Bukhari says in his history that it is related on the authority of Safinah|| that the prophet said of Abu Bakr, Omar, and Othman—“ these shall be the Caliphs after me,” but this is not to be followed, says al Bukhari, because Omar Ali, and Othman have asserted that the prophet did not appoint a successor. Ibn-Haban{ has recorded the above tradition and relates on the autho- rity of Safinah that when the apostle of God built the mosque at Medina, he laid a stone on the foundation and said to Abu Bakr, “ Lay thy stone * For this curious meaning of Sl ys? wy see Lane art. ८) ) yom. + Abu Abdu’llah Muhammad born at Naysabir 321 A. H. (933) and held the office of Kédhi under the Samani rule, and died there A. H. 405 (A. D. 1014). He was the most eminent traditionist of his time. The Mustadrak ala’s Sahihayn (Supple- ment to the two Sahihs of al Bukhéri and Muslim) is the work alluded to. He compo- sed numerous others, on the sciences connected with tradition. Consult, Ibn Khall. ‡ Of the tribe Aud. He was what is called a Tabi or one next in time to the Companions, An Nawawi. § Abdu’llah Muhammad, b. Saad of Basrah called Katib-i- Wakidi from having transcribed and completed the works of that historian. Also author of the Tabakati Kabir, died 845 A. D. Ibn Khall. | Abu Abdu'r Rahman Mihran surnamed Safinah by Muhammad whose freed- man he was, on account of his having carried across a stream some of the Companions with whom Muhammad was one day walking, Safina signifying a boat. An Nawawi. ¶ Abu Abdu’lah Muhammad-b-Yahya-b-Haban, died at Medina A. D. 739, at the ago of 74 An. Naw. | 8 J by the side of my stone ^ ' then he said to Omar “ lay thy stone by the side of the stone of Abu Bakr;’’ then he said to Othman, “lay thy stone by the side of the stone of Omar.” Then he said “ These shall be the Caliphs after me.”’ Abu Zaradh says that his authorities are not unreliable, and indeed al Hakim has recorded it in his Mustadrak and al-Bayhaki has confirmed it in his “ Proofs’? and others besides these two. I remark that there is no contradiction between it and the saying of Omar and Ali that the prophet did not name a successor, for the meaning of these two is that at the time of his death, he did not lay down an authoritative injunction for the succession of any particular one, and this other refers to what occurred at a period antecedent, for it is similar to a saying of the prophet in another tradition, ‘Obey my law, and the law of the Caliphs after me, the orthodox, the rightly guided,” and to his saying, “ Follow those after me Abu Bakr and Omar” and others from among the traditions referring ` to the Caliphate. On the Imams being of the Kuraysh, and the Caliphate being the prerogative of these. Abu Dauid at Taydlisi* in his collection of traditions has recorded from Abu Barzaht that the prophet said—‘ The Imams shall be of the Kuraysh, as long as they shall rule and do justice and promise and fulfil, and pardon is implored of them and they are compassionate.” And at Tirmidit from Abu Hurayrah§ that the apostle of God said; “ the sover- eignty shall rest in the Kuraysh and judicial authority with the Auxili- aries, and calling to prayers with the Abyssinians.” And Im4m Ahmad in his Musnad from U'tbah-b-Abdan that the prophet said: “ ‘The Caliphate shall rest in the Kuraysh and judicial authority with the Auxiliaries and the office of calling to prayer with tae Abyssinians,” His authorities are trustworthy. Al Bazzar has recorded from Ali Ibn Abi Talib that the apostle of God said: “The princes shall be of the Kuraysh; the just among them rulers of the just, and the wicked, rulers of the wicked.” * Abu Dautd Sulayman a Persian by birth resident at Basrah, died A. D. 818. Ibn Khall. † Abu Barzah Nazlah-b-Ubayd one of the Companions who fought by Muhammad's side in seven engagements, dicd during the campaign in Khurasan 684. Ibn Hajr. ‡ Abu [sa Muhammad called after his birthplace Tirmid on the banks of the Oxus. He is one of the six great traditionists, dicd A. D. 892. § A well-known Companion of Muhammad, his real name is a subject of dispute Ibn Hajr places his death in A. H. 59. [ 9 ] a The Imam Ahmad* has related on the authority of Safinah that he heard the Apostle of God say; “The Caliphate shal? last for thirty years and after it, shall follow a monarchy.” The learned say that in these thirty years are included only the four Caliphs and the reign of al Hasan. And al Bazzar from Abu U’baydah-b-u'lt Jarrah that the prophet said ^° Your religion began with the prophetic mission and in clemency: it shall continue with the Caliphate and in clemency ; then shall follow mon- archy and despotism.” A reliable tradition. A’bdu’llah-b-Ahmad records on the authority of Jabir-b-Samurah from the prophet that he said ; “ This rule shall continue in honour, 2६5 holders overcoming all that oppose them therein, up to twelve Caliphs, all of them of the Kuraysh.” The two Shaykhs and others have recorded this and there are other lines of ascription and readings of it; among them—‘this rule shall continue secure,” and “this rule shall remain in force’’—and, according to Muslim, “ the rule over the people shall continue in force until twelve men shall have ruled them ;” and also according to him “this authority shall not come to an end until twelve Caliphs shall have passed away in it from among the people ;”,—and “ Islam shall continue revered and unassailable until there shall have been twelve Caliphs ;”’ and according to al Bazzar, “ the sway of my people shall continue to abide until twelve Caliphs, all of them of the Kuraysh shall have passed away’’—and according to Abu Dautd there is an addition ; “and when he returned to his house, there came to him the Kuraysh and they said, “ then what will follow ?” He replied, “ there will follow sedition.” And also according to him, “ This faith shall continue to abide until twelve Caliphs shall have been over you, upon all of whom the people shall be gathered together :” and according to Ahmad and al Bazzar from Ibn Masa’id who was asked, ‘‘ How many of the Caliphs shall rule this people?” He replied: ‘ We asked the Apostle of God con- cerning them, and he answered ^ Twelve, like unto the number of the chiefs of the children of Israel.” Kadhi I’yadh says that the meaning of the twelve Calipks in this tradition and in those resembling it, is perhaps this, that they would flourish during the period of the glory of the Caliphate and the vigour of Islam, and the integrity of its government, and the gathering of the people around him who assumed the vicegerency, and * The Im4m Abu A’bdu’llah Ahmad as Shaybani-al-Marwazi (native of Marw) was the son of Muhammad-b-Hanbal, born at Baghdad A. H. 164 (A. D. 780), a traditionist of the first class. It is said he knew by heart a million of these traditions, al Bukh4ri and Muslim were his disciples. His persistence in refusing to declare the Kuran created is well-known. He died at Baghdad A. H. 241 (855). + Abu U’baydah commonly called the son of al Jarrah—but incorrectly according to Ibn Hajr and an Nawawi who maintuin that his father was A’bdu’llab and his इमाव्‌ father al Jarrah. 2 | 10 | # these condttions were found in those round whom the people gathered until the sway of the children of Umayyah was troubled and discord fell among them in the reign of Walid-b-Yazid, and thus it continued among them until arose the Abbaside power and they overthrew their sovereignty.” The Shaykh u’l Islim Ibn Hajr in the “ Commentary on al Bukhari says ;''—the words of the Kadhi I’yadh are the best that have been uttered on this traditidn, and the most important, on account of their confirmation of his remark on some of the lines of ascription of the authentic tradition, “upon all of whom the people shall be gathered together:” and the elucidation of this is, that the meaning of gathering together, is their submission to do him homage, and this very thing came to pass, for the people gathered round Abu Bakr, then Omar, then Othman, then A’li until occurred the affair of the “two Arbitrators” at Siffin,* and Mu’dwiyah assumed the Caliphate from that day. Then the people gathered round Mu’dwiyah at the time of the treaty with al Hasan: then they united upon his son Yazid and the authority of al Husayn was never established—nay—he was killed before its accom- plishment. Then when Yazid died, discord fell among them until they gathered round Abdu’) Malik-b-Marwan, after the death of Ibn uz Zubayr. Then they gathered round his four sons, al Walid, and Sulayman, and Yazid and Hisham; and between Sulayman and Yazid, there intervened Omar b-A’bdi’l A’ziz. These, therefore, are seven, after the orthodox Caliphs, and the twelfth is Walid-b-Yazid b-Abdi’l Malik, round whom the people gathered when Hisham, his father’s brother died. He reigned about four years. Then they rose up against him and slew him and dissension prevailed and things were changed from that day, and it never happened after that, that the people gathered round any Caliph, for the reign of Yazid-b- Walid, the same who rose against his cousin al Walid-b-Yazid, was not long: for there marched against him before he died, the son of his father’s uncle, Marwan-b-Muhammad-b-Marwén. When Yazid died, his brother Ibrahim reigned but Marwan slew him; thereupon the sons of 4 "0048 made war upon Marwan until he was slain. Then the first of the Caliphs of the children of Abbas was as Saffih, but his reign was not protracted by reason of the multitude of those who went out against him. Then his brother al Manstr held sway, and his reign was long, but the remote west passed away from them through the conquest of Spain by the * Abu Masa Asha’ri on the part of A’li and A’mr b-u’l As on the part of Mu’é- wiyah. The plain of Siffin, says Gibbon, which extends along the western bank of the Euphrates, is determined by D’Anville (l’ Euphrate et le Tigre, p. 29) to be the Campus Barbaricus of Procopius. | 11 | descendants of Marwdn, and it continued in पोत hands predominant over it, until they afterwards assumed the Caliphate—and things came to such a pass that nothing remained of the Caliphate in the provinces but the name, after it had been that in the time of the children of Abdu’l Malik b-Marwan, the Khutbah was read in the name of the Caliphs in all the regions of the earth, the east and the west, the right hand and the left, wherever the true believer had been victorious, and none in any one of all the provinces, was appointed to hold a single office, except by order of the Caliph. Regarding the immoderate lengths to which things went, verily in the fifth century in Spain alone, there were six persons who assumed the title of Caliph and together with them, a descendant of U’baydu’lah ruler in Egypt and an A’bbdsi in Baghdad, exclusive of those who claimed the Caliphate in the regions of the earth, of the descendants of A’li and the schismatics.”” He adds, “ perhaps this interpretation is the meaning of the prophet’s words “ there will follow sedition,”’ that is, slaughter arising from sedition openly occurring and continuous, and such actually occurred. And it has been also said that the meaning of it is, the appearance of the twelve Caliphs during the whole duration of Islam until the day of judg- ment, acting according to the truth, although their reigns may not follow in succession one after another; and this confirms what has been recorded by Musaddad in his Musnad-i-Kabir from Abu’l Khuld who says, “ This people shall not perish until there shall have been from among them, twelve Caliphs, all of them labouring in the way of salvation and the true faith, and among them, two shall be of the family of Muhammad.” According to this, therefore, the meaning of his words “ there will follow sedition’’ is, the troubles foretelling the resurrection by the coming of Dajjal and the issue thereof—(here he ends).” I observe that according to this, of the twelve Caliphs, are accounted for, the four and al Hasan and Mu’awiyah and Omar Ibn A’bdi’l A’ziz: these are eight and it is probable that there may be added to them, al Mubtadi of the House of A’bbas, for he is among them what Omar-b-A’bdi’l A’ziz is, among the children of Umayyah, and in the same way, ad Dhéhir,* on account of what was vouchsafed unto him of rectitude of conduct, and there remain two who are to be awaited, one among them leing al Mahdi, for he is of the family of Muhammad, upon whom be the blessing and peace of God. ¢ Ad Dhdhir bi’amri lah. [ 12 | On the traditions premonitory of the Caliphate of the children of Umayyah. A’t Tirmidi relates on the authority of Yusuf-b-Saa’d that a man stood up before al Hasan the son of A’li, after he had sworn allegiance to Mu’a- wiyah, and said, ^ Thou hast blackened the faces of the true believers,” and he replied “ Reproach me not, may the Lord have mercy on them, for the prophet saw the children of Umayyah on his pulpit, and it troubled him: then was revealed to him “ Verily we have given thee al Kauthar’’* and there was also revealed to him—“ we sent down the Aurdn on a night of power and what shall make thee understand how excellent the night of power zs: the night of power is greater than a thousand months’’t “in which the children of Umayyah shall possess the Caliphate, O Muhammad.” Al Kasim says, “I have computed and 10 1 it is a thousand months, no more and no less.” At Tirmidi says “ this but once recorded tradition, I know only from the tradition of al Kasim who is reliable but his master is unknown.” Al Hakim has given this tradition in his Mustadrak (Supp/e- ment) and Ibn Jarir in his Commentary—but the Hafidh Abu’l Hajj4j and Ibn Kathir say that it is unreliable. Ibn Jarirt in his Commentary has related on the authority of the grandfather of Abu Sahl that he said, “the Apostle of God saw the child- ren of al Hakam-b-Abi’l A’dg leap upon his pulpit with the leap of apes, and that troubled bim and he never brought himself to smile until his death, and God revealed to him concerning it, “ We have appointed the vision which we showed thee only for an occasion of dispute unto men.’’§ The authorities are weak, but there are concurring testimonies from the traditions of A’bdu’Hah-b-Omar, and Ya’la-b-Murrah, Husayn-b-A’li and others. I have quoted it with its authorities in the Commentary and Musnad, and alluded to it in my work, the “ Reasons of Revelation. * Kur. VIII.—Al Kauthar is a stream in Paradise—the word signifies ‘“‘abun- dance of good.” Hence the gift of wisdom. See Sale. ¢ Kur. XVIII—the concluding sentence is not in the Kuran. t Abu Jaa’far Muhammad-b-Jarir at Tabari is the author of a great Commentary on the Kurdn and a famous history. He was a master of the highest authority (Imém) on various branches of knowledge, such as tradition, jurisprudence and the like—born A. प. 224 (838-9) at Amul in Tabaristén and dicd at Baghdad A. H. 310 (A. D. 923) Ibn Khall. § Kur. XVII. This verse is gencrally supposed to refer to the prophet’s journey to heaven, which was the occasion of much dispute amongst his followers until con- firmed by the testimony of Abu Bakr. Sce Sale. [ 13 | On the traditions annunciatory of the Caliphate of the children of Abbas. Al Bazzar has related from Abu Hurayrah that the Apostle of God said to A’bbas—“ in ye shall rest prophecy and sovereignty :” and at Tir- midi from Ibn A’bbas, that the Apostle of God said to A’bbas, ^“ when it shall be the morning of the second day, come to me, thou and thy son, that I may invoke upon thy descendants a blessing by which, may God profit thee and thy son ;” and he went at dawn and I went with him and he clothed us with a mantle; then he said, “O Lord! vouchsafe unto A’bbas and unto his son, an outward and inward mercy; leave them not in sin; O Lord, preserve him in his son.” Thus has at Tirmidi quoted it in his “ Jami’,” and Razin* al A’bdari has added to the end of it, “and make the Caliphate abiding in his posterity.” I observe that this tradi- tion, and that which precedes it, are the best that have come down on this subject. At Tabaranit records that the Apostle of God said, “I saw in vision the children of Marwan taking possession of my pulpit, one after another, which troubled me, and I saw the children of A’bbas taking possession of my pulpit one after another and that gladdened me ;” and Abu Nua’ymf in his Huliyah, from Abu Hurayrah, that the Apostle of God came forth, and there met him A’bbas and he said, “Shall 1 not give thee good tidings, 0 father of excellence?’ who replied ‘Yea, O Apostle of God,” and he said. ‘Verily God hath begun this authority with me and will fulfil it in thy posterity.” (The ascription is unreliable.) There has also come down a tradition of A’li’s on authorities still weaker than this, quoted by Ibn * Abu’l Hasan Razin-b-Mu’awiyah-b-A’mmér a member of tho tribe of ^ तप d Dar, a native of Saragossa in Spain, was Imém to the Maliki school at Mecca. His work is generally designated Kit4b-i- Razin, in which he assembled and classed all the traditions contained in the Sahih of al Bukhari, and Muslim, the Muwatta of Malik, the Jami’ of at Tirmidi and the Sunan of Abu Daud, died at Mecca A. H. 525 (A. D. 1130.) Ibn Khall. De Slane. ¢ Abu’l Kasim Sulayman b-Ahmad of the tribe of Lakhm, the chiof Hafidh of his time—born at Tabariya in Syria and having settled at Ispahan continued there till his death on Saturday 28th of एप] Ka’adah A. H. 360 (September A. D. 971) at the age of about one hundred. His Dictionary (Mu'jam) of the traditionists is the best known of his works, the large (kabir), small (saghir) and medium (ausat) editions of which are frequently alluded to. Ibn Khall. { Hafidh Abu Nu’aym Ahmad b-A’bdu'llah author of the « a Pl dala or orna- ment of the Saints “ containing the lives of the principal Muslim Saints, born in Rajab 336 (A. D. 948) and died at Ispahan in Safar 430 (A. D. 1038). Ibn Khall. | 4 | A’sakir* from the ascription of Muhammad-b-Yunas al Karimi (and he was a fabricator of traditions) up to A’li, that the Apostle of God, said to A’bbas. «° Verily God hath begun this authority with me and will fulfil it in thy posterity.” And the same has been handed down in the tradition of Ibn ^ 07088 quoted by al Khatibt in his history, and the reading of it as follows: “With ye shall begin this authority and in ye shall it be fulfilled,” and this will appear with its ascription in the life of al Muhtadi एणा. It has also come down in the tradition of A’mmar-b-Yasir, quoted by al Khatib, and Abu Nua’ym records in the Huliyah on the authority of Jabir-b-A’bdu’llah, that the Apostle of God said; “there shall be kings of the posterity of A’bbds, who shall be the rulers of my people; may God glorify the faith through them.” Also in his “ Proofs” from Ummu'l Fadhlt who said “I was passing by the prophet when he exclaimed— “verily thou art pregnant of a boy and when thou givest him birth, then bring him to me,” and when I gave birth to him, I went to the prophet and he called out the Adan in his right ear, and the§ [क्षा in his left, and he made him drink of his spittle and named him Abdu’llah and_ said to me “depart with the Father of the Caliphs.” I made this known to A’bbds and he spoke of it to the Apostle who said, ^^ 16 is what she told you; he is the Father of the Caliphs among whom shall be as Saffah and among whom shall be al Mahdi, and among whom shall be one who shall pray together with Jesus the Son of Mary, upon Him be peace.” Ad Daylami|| in his Musnad प] Firdaus has related from Aysha a tradition ascribed to the prophet—* It shall come to pass that the children of A’bbas shall possess a standard, and it shall not depart from their hands # Abu’l Kaésim A’li, surnamed Thikatuddin, a native of Damascus and chief tradi- tionist of Syria who acquired a superiority in that science that no other had ever attain- ed, born A. H. 499, (1105) died at Damascus A. Hf. 571, (A. D. 1176). Ibn Khall. + Héfidh Abu Bakar Abmad-b-A’li known as Alkhatib or the preacher, a native of Baghdad who composed a history of the city and is the author of nearly one hun- dred works. Though a doctor of law, he made tradition his principal study, born A. H. 392 (A. 7. 1002) and died A. H. 463 (A. D. 1071). Ibn Khall. t The “ Mother of Excellence,” the name of the wife of A’bbas and also of his daughter, the former is here meant. § The Ikdémah is a sentenco which is said after the conclusion of the Adan or call to prayer and which announces that prayers have begun. This ceremony is still occa- sionally performed at the birth of a child—but is not obligatory. | Abu Shujéé Shirdyiah-b-Shahrdar-b-Shirdyiah-b-Fanna Khusrau of Hamadan ad Daylami. He was the author of a history of Hamadaén and the *“ Musnad u'l Fir- daus.” Héfidh Yahya-b-Mandah says of him that though fairly well read, his know- ledge of traditions was imperfect, and he could not distinguish between good and untrust-worthy ones and therefore his Firdaus is full of idle tales, died A. H. 509. Bustan प] Mubaddithin, [ 15 ] as long as they shall uphold righteousness.’ And Darakutni* in his ^ Afrad” from Ibn A’bbas that the prophet said to A’bbas, “ When thy posterity shall inhabit the Sawwadt and clothe themselves in black and their followers shall be the people of Khurasaén, dominion shall not cease to abide with them until they resign it unto Jesus, the Son of Mary.” Ahmad b-Ibrahim is a worthless authority and his master is unknown and the tradition is so little reliable that Ibn प] Jauzif has mentioned it in his ^ Fabrications’—but there is evidence for it in a tradition ascribed to the prophet, quoted by at Tabarani in the “ Kabir”—“the Caliphate shall abide among the children of my paternal uncle, and of the race of my father, until they deliver it unto the Messiah.” (A’d Daylami has quoted it from Ummi Salimah§ with a different ascription). | Al U’kaylil| records in his book of “ Invalid authorities,” a tradition ascribed to the prophet “ the children of Abbas shall reign two days for every day in which the children of Umayyah shall reign, and two months for every month.” Ibn u’l Jauzi has quoted thisin his ‘ Fabrications’ and has invalidated it on account of the untrustworthiness of Bakkar,{ but it is not as he has said, for verily, Bakkar should not be accused of falsehood nor fabrication ; moreover Ibn A’di says of him, that he is among the doubtful authorities whose traditions are recorded, and has added ‘ [ hope there is no harm in accepting him as an authority ;”” and on my life, the purport of this tradition is not far from the truth, for the Abbaside * Abu’l Hasan A’li-b-Omar. A Hafidh of great learning and a Shafii doctor, was a native of Baghdad—the name Darakutni means belonging to Daru’l Kutn (cotton house) a quarter of Bughdad, born A. प्र. 306 (A. D. 919) and died A. प्र, 385 (A. D. 995). + The towns and villages of Babylonian I’rdk. ‡ Abu’l Faraj Ibn प] Jauzi a celebrated preacher and doctor of the Hanbalites. His compositions are so numerous that it is said (with some exaggeration) that he wrote 180 pages a day ; and the parings of his pens were gathered up into a heap and in pursuance of his last orders, were employed to heat the water with which his corpse was washed. Born about A. H. 508 (1114-5), died at Baghdad A. H. 597 (A. D. 1281). His “ Fabricated Traditions’ —is in 4 Vols. Ibn Khall. Saadi of Shiraz mentions him in the Gulistan as having counselled him to forego profane music, the neglect of which advice was avenged on the sensitive ears of the poet, at a convivial meeting as therein related. § One of the prophet’s wives. || De Slane so writes the name, but in a note (Vol. IV, p. 199,) he remarks that according to Ibn Duraid, Lis should be pronounced A’kil. ‘This is so in respect of the son of Abu Talib and Akil-b-Mukarrin the Companion, but U’kay] was the epony- mous ancestor of a branch of the Hawdzin who were of the tribe of Kays. See the Muntaha’l Arab. र One of the authorities in the line of ascription. [ 16 ] rule, at the time of its splendour, and the extension of its authority throughout the countries of the earth, towards the rising and the setting sun, besides the remote west, may be placed between the year one hundred and thirty and odd and the year 290 when al Muktadir reigned, and in his time, its organisation was broken up, and the whole west seceded from its sway: then followed dissension and trouble in his government and after him, as will appear. Thus the period of the glory of their sovereignty and their dominion was about 160 years, and that is double the reign of the illustrious children of Umayyah for that lasted 92 years, from which must be deducted nine years, during which, the authority was vested in Ibn u’z Zubayr: thus there remains 83 years and a fraction and that is a thousand months exactly and so I have afforded confirmation of the tradition. Az Zubayr-b-Bakkar* records in his ‘ Muwaffakiyat, from Ibn Abbas, that he said to Mu’awiyah “ ye shall not reign a day, but we shall reign two, and not a month but we shall reign two months, and nota year but we shall reign two years:’’ and, “the black standards shall be for us, the people of the prophetical House,” and, “their overthrow shall not come save from the side of the west.” Ibn A’sakir relates in his history of Damascus from Ibn A’bbasf that the Apostle of God said to him “ O God, defend A’bbas and the son of A’bbas,” and he said this three times: then he exclaimed, “O uncle, dost thou not know, that al Mahdi shall be of thy descendants,—the prospered of God, happy, and approved. “ (al Karimif is a fabricator). Ibn Saa’d records in his Tabakat (classes) from Ibn A’bbas, that al A’bb4s the son of A’bdu’l Muttalib, sent to the children of A’bdu’l Muttalib, and he gathered them together about him and A’li held a place in his estimation which no other possessed, and al A’bbas said—‘ O son of my brother, verily I have formed an opinion and I do not wish to deter- mine anything regarding it until I have sought counsel of thee;’’ then A’li said—“ What is 1४? He replied. “Go to the prophet and ask of him, in whom shall rest this authority after him and if it rest in us, we * Abu A’bdu’llah az Zubayr, a member of the tribe of Kuraysh. He was Kadhi of Mecca and composed the genealogies of the Kuraysh, a standard authority on the subject. He also taught traditions and died at Mecca A. H. 256 (A. D. 870) aged 84. Ibn Khall. He named the book mentioned in the text after his son al Muwaffak to whom he dedicated it. Mastidi Tome VII. p. 91. t Abu'l 4 7085 A’bdu’llah son of A’bbés uncle of Muhammad, born three years before the Hijrah. He was considered the ablest interpreter of the Koran of his day and the most learned in the traditions, the legal decisions of the first three Caliphs, the law, and the sciences of poetry and arithmetic. Appointed governor of Basrah by the Caliph A’li, died at Taif A. H. 68 (A. D. 687) aged 70. Ibn Khall. De Slane. ‡ Al Karimi is one of the authorities in the line of ascription. [ 17 | shall not resign it, by Allab, while there remaineth of usa chief upon the earth, and if it rest in other than us, we shall never seek it.” A’li said, “O uncle, in whom shall abide this authority save in thee, and will any contend with you regarding this authority ?” Ad Daylami in his Musnad प] Firdaus, records a tradition ascribed to the prophet “ When God willeth to form any one for the Caliphate, he toucheth his forehead with His right hand.” On the dignity of the prophetic mantle which the Caliphs wore in succession to the very last. As Silafi,* in his Tuydriyat, has quoted, with its ascription to al Agma’t,f on the authority of Ibn A’mr-b-i’l A’la, that when Kaa’b b-uz Zubayr read out before the prophet his poem beginning Banat Su’ad,f he threw to him the mantle that was upon him ; and when Mu’éwiyah reigned, he wrote to Kaa’b saying, “sell me the mantle of the Apostle of God for ten thousand dirhams,” but he refused, and when Kaa’b died, Mu’dwiyah sent to his children an offer of twenty thousand dirhams, and he received from them the mantle, the same which was in the possession of the Caliphs of the House of 4 "7785, and this has been related by others. But ad Dahabi says in his history ; “ regarding the mantle in the possession of the Caliphs of the House of 4707085, verily Yanas-b-Bukayr relates from the account of the expedition of Tabak of Ibn Ishak, that the prophet gave a mantle to the people of Aylah,§ with his letter, the same that he wrote * Abu’l T&hir Ahmad, called as Silafi after his grandfather, from the Persian (Seh lab) three lips—he received this name as one of his lips was s’plit and appeared double. He was a Hafidh and taught traditions and was appointed President of the College called after him, founded in A. H. 546 (1151) by al Aadil as Sallér at Alex- andria; born at Ispahan 472 A. H. (1079) and died A. H. 576 (1180). Ibn Khall. The printed edition has Turyét for Tuyuriyét. + Abu Sa’id A’bdu’l Malik the celebrated philologer, a native of Basrah, but removed to Baghdad in the reign of Hardin u’r Rashid. He wasa complete master of the Arabic language and was consulted by al Mamin on all doubtful points of litera- ture; for his numerous treatiscs, consult Ibn Khall, born A. H. 122 (740), died at Basrah 216 (831). ‡ This well-known poem was recited before Muhammad on the poet’s embracing Islam. He had written some satirical verses on the prophet, who in consequence ordered his followers to put him to death if they caught him. Kaa’b not caring to indulge his wit at the expense of his life, made his submission. Tho poem begins with the praise of his mistress Su’4d and ends with an cntreaty of pardon. § On the Red Sea, the Elana of Ptolemy. 3 [ 18 ] to them granting them immunity and Abu'l A’bbés as Saffah purchased it for 300 dinars.” I remark that that which Mu’dwiyah bought was lost in the decline of the House of Umayyah. The Imém Ahmad b-Han- bal records in his “ Zuhd” from U’rwah-b-uz Zubayr* that the garment in which the Apostle of God went out to meet deputations was a mantle from Hadhramaut, its length four cubits, and its breadth two cubits and a span, which was in the possession of the Caliphs, and it became thread bare, and they lined it with stuffs and it used to be worn on the festivals of Adha and Fitr. Verily this mantle was in the possession of the Caliphs, and they inherited it in succession, and wore it upon their shoulders, on state occasions, whether in assembly or mounted cavalcade, and it was upon al Muktadir when he was slain, and was stained with his blood, and I think it was lost during the irruption of the Tartars—“ for we belong to God and unto him shall we return.” (Kur II.) On some observations which occur scattered throughout these biographies, but the mention of which here in one place is most suitable and advantageous. Ibn प] Jauzi narrates that according to as Suli,t it is said that every sixth Osliph who ruled over the people was deposed, and adds “ I reflected on this and observed it with wonder, The supreme authority was vested in our prophet; then there arose Abu Bakr, and Omar and Othman, and A’li and al Hasan—and he was deposed. Then Mu’dwiyah and Yazid-b- Mu’dwiyah and Mu’awiyah-b-Yazid and Marwan, and A’bdu’l Malik-b- Marwan and Ibn u’z Zubayr and he was deposed. Then al Walid and Sulayman and Omar-b-A’bdi’l A’ziz and Yazid and Hishém and al Walid and he was deposed. After this the dominion of the House of Umayyah ceased, and as Saffah reigned, and al Mansur and al Mahdi and al Hadi and ar Rashid and al Amin and he was deposed. Then al Mamin and al Mua’tagim and al Wathik and al Mutawakkil and al Muntasir and al Musta’in and he was deposed. Then al Mua’tazz and al Muhtadi, and al # Abu A’bdu’llah, one of the seven great jurisconsults of Medina. His father az Zubayr b-A’wwim was one of the ten Companions to whom Muhammad promised Paradise. His mother was Asma-d. of Abu Bakr—born A, H. 22 (642-3), died A. H. . 93 (711-2). Ibn Khall. + Abu Bakr as Sili known as the chess-player. He was an accomplished scholar and traditionist. He became one of the Caliph ar Radhi’s boon companions and was intimate with al Muktafi and al Muktadir. He composed numerous works; the chief cience he cultivated was biography, died at Basrah A. H. 336 (A. D. 986-7). Ibn Khall, [ 19 | Mua’tamid, and al Mua’tadhid and al Muktafi and al Muktadir and he was deposed, and again a second time and then put todeath. Thenal Kdhir and ar Radhi and al Muttaki and al Mustakfi and al Mutii’ and at Taii’ and he was deposed. Then al Kadirand al Kaim and al Muktadi and al Mustadhir and al Mustarshid and ar Rashid and he was deposed.” This is the end of the narration of Ibn प] Jauzi Ad Dahabi says that what al Jauzi has mention- ed is defective in several points. One of them is his statement, that A’bdu’l Malik was succeeded by Ibn u’z Zubayr, but this was not the case, for Ibn u’z Zubayr was fifth and after him came A’bdu’l Malik. Either both of them must be fifth, or one was the true Caliph and the other a rebel, for unto Ibn u’z Zubayr was sworn a prior allegiance, and therefore the Caliphate of A’bdu’l Malik was legally established only from the time when Ibn w’z Zubayr was killed. The second point is, his omitting to count Yazid An Nakis and his brother Ibrahim who was deposed and Mar- wan; for thus computing them, al Amin would be the ninth. I remark that it has already been said, that Marwan falls out of the account, because he was a rebel, and also Mu’dwiyah-b-Yazid, for allegiance was sworn to Ibn u’z Zubayr after the death of Yazid, and Mu’awiyah opposed him in Syria: these two are therefore one, and the authority of Ibrahim, he who succeeded Yazid An Nakis was not completely established, for some acknowledged him as Caliph, and others did not so acknowledge him: and there were some who claimed for him the supreme power, but not the Caliphate, and he ruled but for forty or seventy days. Therefore according to this computation, Marwan the Ass,* was the sixth, for he was the twelfth from Mu’awiyah, and al Amin after him, the sixth. Thirdly, the deposals are not confined to every sixth, for al Mua’tazz was deprived of office and likewise al Kahir, al Muttaki and al Mustakfi. I reply that his statement is not affected by this objectzon because the meaning is, that as regards every sixth, the deposal is undoubted, but he does not deny that there were others besides them who were deposed as well. He adds in addition to what Ibn u’l Jauzi has stated, that after ar Rashid, reigned 9] Muktafi and al Mustanjid and al Mustadhii, and an Nasir and al Dhabir and 8] Mustangir who was the sixth but was not deposed. Then al Mus- ta’gim, and he was the same whom the Tartars slew, and was the last of the sovereign Caliphs. The Caliphate was interrupted subsequently for three years and a half; then al Mustansir afterwards was elected, * ‘ Before his accession to the throne’’ says Gibbon “he had deserved by his Geor- gian warfare, the honorable epithet of the Ass of Mesopotamia. He had been governor of Mesopotamia and the Arabic proverb praises the courage of that warlike breed of asses who never fly from an enemy. The surname of Mervan may justify the compa- rison of Homer (Iliad A 557) and both will silence the modcrns who consider the ass a stupid and ignoble omblem.” | 20 | but he did not actually assume the Caliphate, for he was acknowledged in Egypt and he marched into Yrak and encountered the Tartars and was killed likewise, and the Caliphate remained in abeyance a yéar. Then it was established in Egypt, and the first of the Caliphs was al H4kim, then al Mustakfi, then al Wathik, then al Hékim, then al Mua’tadhid, then al Mutawakkil who was the sixth and was deposed. Then reigned al Mua’- tasim but he was deposed after fifteen days and al Mutawakkil recalled. He was again deposed and al Wathik acknowledged: then al Mua’tagim and he was deposed, and al Mutawakkil recalled who continued to reign until his death. Next al Musta’in, and al Mua’tadhid and al Mustakfi, then al Kdéim, who was the sixth from al Mua’tasim the first (who was also al Mua’tagim the second) and he was deposed. Then al Mustanjid the reigning Caliph, the fifty first of the Caliphs of the House of A’bbas. Note. It is said that the House of A’bbis is distinguished by a be- ginning, a middle, and an end—The beginning was al Mangur, the middle al Madmin and the end al Mua’tadhid. The Caliphs of the House of A’bbas, were all of them the children of concubines, except as Saffah, al Mahdi and al Amin, and no Hashimite, the son of a Hashimite woman, ever ruled the Caliphate except A’li-b-Abi Talib and his son al Hasan, and al Amin (so says as Sali)—and no one whose name was A’li ever held the Caliphate except A’li the son of Abu Télib and A’li al Muktafi (ad Dahabi). .I remark that the greater number of the names of the Caliphs occur but once, and few twice, and those most frequently recurring are A’bdu’llah, Ahmad and Muhammad,—and all the surnames of the Caliphs occur singly up to al Musta’sim, the last of the Caliphs of frak—Then recur the surnames of the Caliphs of Egypt—thus al Mustansir recurs, and al Mustakfi, and al Wathik, and al Hakim, and al Mua’tadhid, and al Mutawakkil, and al Mua’tasim,* and al Musta’in, and al Kaim, and al Mus- tanjid. All of these recur but once, except al Mustakfi and al Mua’tadhid which recur once oftener, for among the A’bbaside Caliphs, three are called by those two names. Not one of the Caliphs of the House of A’bbds is distinguished by a surname of the House of U’bayd, except al क्षण, al Hakim, ad Dhahir and al Mustansir, but as regards al Mahdi and al Mangir, the assumption of these surnames by the House of A’bbas preceded the rise of the House of U’bayd. And ‘some writers have mentioned that none surnamed al Kahir was prosperous, either among the Caliphs or the temporal sovereigns, and I add also, al Mustakfi and al Musta’in, by which surnames two of the House of A’bbas were distinguished, and those two were deposed and ex- pelled but al Mua’tadhid is among the most glorious of surnames and the * The text has Musta’sim incorrectly. The MS. is accurate in the name. [ 21 | most blessed for him who was called by it. No one held the Caliphate after the son of his brothers, except al Mustakfi after ar Rashid, and al Mus- tangir after al Mua’tasim. Ad Dahabi states this, and adds that no three brothers possessed the Caliphate, except the sons of ar Rashid, viz., al Amin, al Mamiun, and al Mua’tasim, and the sons of al Mutawakkil, viz., al Mus- tansir, al Mua’tazz and al Mua’tamid, and the sons of al Muktadir, viz., ar Raédhi, al Muktafi and al Mutii’. He continues, that four of the sons of A’bdu’l Malik governed the state, and that no parallel to this is to be found, except among temporal sovereigns, I remark that a parallel case to it occurs among the Caliphs after the prophet, for four, nay five of the sons of al Mutawakkil Muhammad, held the Caliphate, véz., al Musta’in, and al Mua’tadhid, and al Mustakfi, and al Kéim and al Mustanjid the reigning Caliph. No one ruled the Caliphate during the lifetime of his father except Abu Bakr as Siddik, and Abu Bakr at Téii’-b-ul Mutii’, whose father was struck by paralysis and who voluntarily abdicated in favour of his son. The learned say that the first who governed the Caliphate while his father was alive, was Abu Bakr, and he was the first who appointed a successor, and the first who instituted a public treasury and the first who named the Kurdn al Mushaf. The first who was called, prince of the Faithful, was Omar-b-y’l Khattéb, and he was the first who made use of the scourge, and the first who established the date from the Flight, and the first who ordered the prayers called at Tarawih,* and the first who established the public registers. The first who interdicted pasturage from encroachment, was Othman, and he was the first who assigned lands on feudal tenure, that is to say, the first who did so to any extent, and the first who made the addition of the call to prayer on Fridays, and the first who sanctioned a stipend for the criers to prayer, and the first who was confused in speech while read- ing the Khutbah, and the first who appointed a chief Officer of Consta- bulary. The first who during his lifetime named an heir to succeed him, was Mu’dwiyah, and he was the first who introduced eunuchs into his ser- vice. The first who ever caused the heads of criminals to be brought before him was A’bdu’llah-b u’z Zubayr. The first who caused his name to be struck on the coinage, was A’bdu’] Malik-b-Marwan. The first who pro- hibited his being addressed by name was al Walid-b-A’bdi’l Malik. The first introduction of surnames, was by the House of A’bbds. Ibn Fadhli’llah says that some think that the House of Umayyah had sur- * A form of prayer performed at some period of the night, in tho month of Rama- dhan, after the ordinary prayer of nightfall consisting of twenty or more re’kahs, according to different persuasions. Lane’s Lex. Art. 429 + छ [ 22 J names similar to those of the House of A’bbis. I remark that certain writers assert the surname of Mu’dwiyah to have been an Nasir li dini’llah, and the surname of Yazid, al Mustangir, and that of Mu’awiyah his son, ar Raji’ 11111 Hakk, and that of Marwdn, al Mitamin णाक) and that of A’bdu’l Malik, al Muwaffak li’ amri’ll4h, and that of his son al Walid, al Muntakim bi’lléh, and that of Omar-b-A’bdi’l A’ziz, al Ma’gim bi’lléh, and that of Yazid-b-Abdi’l Malik, al K&dir bi Sana’ i’lléh, and that of Yazid an N&kis, as Shakir li anu’mi’llah. The first time that public opinion became conflicting and disunited was in the reign of as Saffah. The first Caliph who gave access to astrologers and acted according to the judgments of the stars was al Manstr, and he was the first who employed slaves in offices of trust and gave them prece- dence over Arabs. The first who ordered the composition of polemical writings to refute the enemies of the Faith was al Mahdi. The first before whom men walked with swords and maces, was al Hadi. The first who played at polo in the open plain was ar Rashid. In the reign of al Amin, the Caliph was first addressed by word and in writing, by his surname. Al Mua’tasim was the first who employed Turks in the office of the public registers. Al Mutawakkil was the first who ordered a distinguishing garb for Jews and Christians. The first whom the Turks adjudged to death was al Mutawakkil: and from this is seen the confirmation of the prophe- tical tradition as quoted by at Tabardni by a respectable line of ascription, from Ibn Masa’id who stated that the Apostle of God said, “‘ Molest not the Turks, as long as they leave ye unmolested, for verily they who shall first take from my people their kingdom and the things which the Lord hath conferred upon them, are the sons of Kantira.’’* The first who invented large sleeves and diminished the size of the head-dress was al Musta’in. Al Mua’tazz was the first Caliph who intro- duced ornaments of gold on riding animals. Al Mua’tamid was the first Caliph treated with severity and kept under restraint and guarded. The first. who ruled the Caliphate among minors wasal Muktadir. The last Caliph who kept the troops and public effects under his personal direction was ar Radhi, and he too was the last Caliph, whose poems were collected into a Diw4n, and the last Caliph who uniformly read the Khutbah and prayed before the people, and the last Caliph who sat in company with boon com- panions, and the last Caliph whose expenses and gifts and rewards, retinue, and stipend, and treasury and meats and drinks and festal assemblies, and chamberlains, and other affairs were conducted after the manner of the * Banu Kanttira, Turks or Nubians according to the Munutahal पा Arab, or as some say Kantira was the name of a slave of Abraham’s, from whom the Turks aro descended. [ 23 | early Caliphate ; and he was the last Caliph who went journeying in gar- ments like unto the Caliphs of former times. The first time that surnames recurred was after the reign of al Mus- tansir, he who ruled after al Musta’sim. (This is mentioned in the Awail of al A’skari*). The first Caliph who reigned during his mother’s lifetime, was Othman-b-Affan, then al Hadi, and ar Rashid, and al Amin and al Mutawakkil, al Mustansir, al Musta’in, al Mua’tazz, al Mua’tadhid and al Mutii’. No one held the Caliphate during the lifetime of his father, except Abu Bakr as Siddik, and to him may be added at क्षाः. A’s पा says: “ I know of no woman who gave birth to two Caliphs, except Wiladah, the mother of al Walid and as Sulayman, the two sons of Abdu’l Malik ; and Shahin, the mother of Yazid an Nakig and Ibrahim, the two sons of al Walid; and Khayzuran, the mother of al H4di and ar Rashid.” I remark, that there may be added, the mother of al A’bbas and Hamzah, and the mother of Dauid and Sulayman, the children of the last Mutawakkil. Those who assumed the title of Caliph, of the House of U’bayd, were fourteen : three in Africa, al Mahdi, al Kéim, and al Mansur, and eleven in Egypt, al Mui’zz, al A’ziz, ad Dhahir, al Mustansir, al Musta’li, al Amir, al Hafidh, ad Dhafir, al Faiz and al A’adhid. The beginning of their rule was in the year two hundred and ninety and odd, and its extinction in the year 567. Ad Dahabi says that this may be called the Magian or the Jewish dynasty, but not ¢hat of the descendants of A’li, or the Batinitet not the Fatimite, and they were fourteen violaters of covenants not successors to the vicegerency, (here he ends). Those who assumed the title of Caliph among the descendants of Umayyah in the West,{ were in a better position than the descendants of * Al Hasan-b-A’bdi’llah-b-Sah]l. Abu पाक्ष al A’skari, a disciple of Abu Ahmad al A’skari; author of a Commentary on the Kurén in 5 Vols.: the Awéail (Initions) : a work on prose and verse, and another on Proverbs, A scholar of exemplary life. Died subsequently to the year 400 A. H. (1009). Tabak&t u’l Mufassirin, as Suydti Edit. Mearsinge. No. 29. + U’baydu’liah, the founder of this dynasty, claimed descent from Ism&fl-b-Jaa’ far the seventh Imém of the posterity of Ali, and his descendants are termed by the Orien. tal writers, the Ismailites of the West to distinguish them from another branch of the same race, the Ismailites of the East. These latter were the famous assassins, called also Batinis from their nystical interpretation of the Kuran, under whose terrible daggers, the East crouched for two hundred years. ‡ Tho Arabs termed Spain and Africa, indifferently, the West (Al Maghrab)— The word “ Afrikiya,” which they sometimes use, is not the whole but only a portion of al Maghrab. For its divisions, consult D\Herbelot. [ 24 | U’baydu’llah in many ways, as regards orthodoxy, and tradition and justice and merit, and knowledge, and battling and warring with infidels, and they were many in number, so that there were together at one time in Spain, six persons, each of them calling himself Caliph, Some former writers have compiled histories of the Caliphs: among them, that by Niftawayh the Grammarian, in two volumes, up to the reign of al Kahir, and the Aur&k of as Sdhi, in which he has mentioned the Abbasides only up to*—with which I am acquainted, and the history of the Caliphs by Abu’l Fadh] Ahmad-b-Abi Tahir al Marwazi, al Katib one of the most excellent of poets who died in the year 280 A. H.; and the history of the Abbaside Caliphs by Amir Abu Musa Hartin-b-Muhammad al A’bbasi. Al Khatib in his History, records with authorities from Muhammad b-A’bbad that none of the Caliphs knew the Kur&n by heart, except Oth- mén-b-A’ffan and al क्षारा. I remark, that that restriction is not to pass unchallenged, for Abu Bakr knew it accurately also, and several authors have made this clear, among them an Nawawi in his Tahdib w’l Asm4; and of Ali likewise it is handed down by one line of tradition that he had the whole of it by heart, after the death of the prophet. Ibn u’s 8431 says—“ I was present at the ceremony of allegiance sworn to the Caliph ad Dh&hir, and he was seated at the window of a chamber in a white robe, and about him a cloak of camel’s hair, and upon his shoulders, the mantle of the prophet : the wazir was standing in front of him upon a pulpit, and the Comptroller of the Household upon a step below him, and he was taking the covenant from the people : and the words of the covenant were, “I do homage to our lord and master the Imam, to whom obedience is a bounden duty upon all men, Abu Nagr Muhammad an Dhahir bi’amr’illéh according to the book of God, and the law of the prophet and the decision of the prince of the faithful, and verily there is no Caliph but he.” ® Tho MS. has here a blank—the text insorta 95 (|. As Silidied in A. H 336 and as his History professes only to relate what he had himself seen (see Kashfu’d Dhunin), the blank might be filled up with the name of al Mutii li’ lléh who succeeded to the Caliphate in A. H. 334, [ 25 ] Abu Bakr as Siddik. Abu‘Bakr as Siddik, the vicegerent of the apostle of God whose name 18 A’bdu’llah-b-Abi Kuh4fah Othman, b-A’amir, b-A’mr, b-Kaa’b, b-Saa’d, b-Taym, b-Murrah, b-Kaa’b, b-Luwayy, b-Ghalib, al Kurayshi, at Taymi, | unites with the genealogy of the Apostle of God in Murrah.”’* An Nawawi in his Tahdib says “ What I have stated regarding the name of Abu Bakr being A’bdu’llah, is correct, and well known. It is said also, that his name was Atik (the Liberated), but the truth upon which all the learned are agreed is, that al A’tik was his surname, not a name, and he was surnamed al A’tik on account of his exemption from hell firet as has come down in the tradition given by at Tirmidi: and it is also said, on account of the “ itakat’’ of his countenance, that is to say, its comeliness and its beauty. It is said likewise that there is nothing in his genealogy which can be found fault with. Musa’b-b-uz Zubayr and others say, that the people concurred in naming him as Siddik (Witness to the Truth), because he hastened to testify to the Apostle of God, and steadfastly adhered to truth, and there never escaped from him on any one of the many events of his lzfe any remissness or hesitation, and he held exalted positions in Islam. Among those events, were his conduct regarding the Nocturnal journey, and his steadfastness and reply to the unbelievers regarding it, and his flight with the Apostle of God, and his forsaking his family and children, and his being with the Apostle in the cave, and throughout the whole journey: then his exhortations on the day of Badr, and the day of Hudaybiyahf when the delay in entering Mecca, was the occasion of grave श = Tamim Kile 6५३ Kusayy Kia'b A’bd 1००६६ re Héchim ९५ | A’bdu’l Muttalib Abu ण, A’bdu lah Abu Bakr Muhammad. + Nine others are included by Muhammad as sharing this distinction, Omar, Othmén, A’li, Talhah, az Zubayr, Saa’d Ibn Abi Wakkas, Said, Abu U’baydah, and A’bdu’r Rahmén-b-Auf. t “Muhammad” says Sale “when at Hudaybiyah sent Jawwas-b-Ommeyya the Khozafte to acquaint the Meccans that he was come with a peaceable intention 4 [ 26 | doubts to others: then his weeping when the Apostle of God said “ Verily, God hath given his servant a choice between this world and the next:” then his firmness on the day of the death of the Apostle of God, and his reading the Khutbah to the people and consoling them: then, in the con- tention regarding the oath of allegiance, his undertaking the charge for the good of the true believers: next, his diligence in despatching the army of Usdmah-b-Zayd to Syria, and his determination regarding it: then his rising up to oppose the apostates, and his dispute with the Companions, until he overwhelmed them with arguments and God opened their hearts as He had opened his heart to the understanding of the truth, viz., to do, battle with the apostates: then his fitting out the army for Syria for his conquests and sending it succour: lastly the conclusion of this career by an important action which was among the best of his good deeds, and the most glorious of his titles to honor, and that was, his appointing Omar as his successor over the true believers: and what virtues, and dignities, and excellencies without number belong not to the Witness to the Truth °” (an Nawawi). I add that I am desirous of enlarging upon the biography of as Siddik to some extent, mentioning therein much of what I know of him regarding his life, and I shall arrange this in sections. Regarding his name and surname an allusion to which has already preceded. Ibn Kathir* says, that all admit that his name was A’bdu’llah-b-Oth- man, except the narration of Ibn Saa’d on the authority of Ibn Sirin,+ which asserts his name to have been A’tik whereas the truth is that it was his surname. Then there is some disagreement as to the time of his being so surnamed, and the reason of it: for some say that it was on account of to visit the temple, but they refusing to admit him, he sent Othmén whom they im- prisoned and a report ran that he was slain whereupon, Muhammed called his men about him and they took an oath to be faithful to him even to death.” * The Héfidh I’madu’ddin Isma’il-b-Abdu’llah ad Damashki died in 774 A. पर. The name of his well known history is the “ Biddyah wa’l N ibéyah fi’t Térikh’”—“ the beginning and the end of history.’’ Consult. Haj. Khal. t Abu Bakr Muhammad a native of Basrah. He was born A. H. 33 (A. D. 653 4) two years before the death of the Caliph Othmdn and died at Basrah A. H. 110 (A. D. 729). He was a draper by profession, delivered traditions on the authority ae Hurayra and others and was skilled in the interpretation of dreams. Ibn [ 2 | the ^“ 16४४१ of his countenance that is, its beauty—but Abu Nua’ym al Fadhl-b-Dukayn says, that it was on account of his priority* in merit— and also it is said, on account of the nobility of his pedigree, that is its purity, as there is nothing in his lineage that can be accounted a stain, and it is said too that he was first so named and afterwards called A’bdu’llah. At Tabardni relates from al Kasim-b-Muhammadt that he questioned Ayesha as to the name of Abu Bakr, and she replied, “ A’bdu’llah ;” then he said that the people called him A’tik; she answered that Abu Kuhafah had three sons whom he named Atik, Mua’tak, and Mua’ytak. Ibn Mandahf and Ibn A’sakir record on the authority of Musa-b- Talhah that he said, “I asked my father Talhah, why°Abu Bakr was called A’tik ;'' he replied, ‘his mother had no son surviving and when she gave him birth, she took him to the temple and exclaimed, ‘O God! if this one is granted immunity from death, then bestow him upon me.’” 46 Tabardni records from Ibn A’bbas, that he was called A’tik from the beauty of his countenance, and Ibn A’sakir from Ayesha that she said “the name of Abu Bakr, that by which his family called him, was A’bdu’llah, but the - name of A’tik superseded it”—and in one reading, ^“ but the prophet named him A’tik.” Abu Ya’la§ records in his Musnad (likewise Ibn Saa’d and al Hajgjim) and confirms it on the testimony of Ayesha, that she said. “By Allah verily I was in my house on a certain day and the Apostle of God and his Companions were in the courtyard, and a curtain between me arid them, and lo! Abu Bakr came up, and the prophet said, ‘‘he who would rejoice in looking upon one exempted from hell fire, let him behold Abu Bakr,” and verily his name, that by which his family called him was A’bdu’llah but the name of A’tik superseded it.” And at Tirmidi and al Hakim from Ayesha, that Abu Bakr went to the Apostle of God and he said. ^ 0 ! Abu Bakr, thou art exempted by the Lord from hell fire,” and from that day, he was called A’tik. Al Bazzér and at Tabarani record on good authority from A’bdu’llah-b-u’z Zubayr, that the name of Abu Bakr was A’bdu’llah, and the Apostle of God said to him “ thou art exempted by the Lord from hell fire ;’ thus he received the name of A’tik. * A’tik signifying also ancient, noble. ¢ Grandson of Abu Bakr one of the most eminent of the Tabi'is and of the seven great jurisconsults of Medina. Ibn Khall. { Abu A’bdu’llah-b-Mandah a cclebrated traditionist and a Hafidh of high autho- rity, author of a history of Ispahan, died A. H. 301, (A. D. 913-4). Ibn Khall. § Héfidh Abu Ya’la Ahmad author of a well known collection of traditions and of works on ascetic devotion and other subjects, born at Mosal A. H. 210 (826) diced A. H. 307, (919-20). Do Slane, I. K. [ 28 ] As regards as Siddik, it is said that he was so called in the time of ignorance, because he was distinguished for his Jove of truth. (Ibn Mandah*) ; and also because he hastened to certify to the truth of the prophet with regard to what he announced. Ibn Ishakt records on the authority of Hasan al Bagrit and Katadah,§ that the first time he was known by it was the morning after the “ Noc- turnal Journey.’”’ Al Hakim relates in his Mustadrak (Supplement) on the authority of Ayesha, that the idolaters went to Abu Bakr and said “ What dost thou think of thy companion, who pretends that he was borne by night to Jerusalem ?’’ He replied, “and did he say that?” They answered “ yes ;” then he said “ Verily he hath spoken the truth, and indeed I would testify to him in more than that, even to the announcement of his journey to Heaven, going in the morning and returning in the evening,” and for this he was called the Witness to the Truth. (The authorities are ood). = । Seatac narrates in his “Traditions” from Ibn Wahab, the freedman of Abu Hurayrah that when the Apostle of God returned on the night of his Nocturnal journey, he arrived at Du व| and said, “O! Gabriel, verily my people will not believe me.” He replied “Abu Bakr will gestify to thee, for he is a Witness to the Truth.” Al Hakim in his Mustadrak, (Supplement) records on the authority of Nazal-b-Sabrah that he tells us, ‘I said unto ’Ali, O Prince of the Faith- ful tell me*of Abu Bakr.’”’ He replied ‘ The Lord named that man as * So the MS.; the text has Ibn Masada who was one of al Mamin’s vizirs, an elegant writer but not stated by Ibn Khallakan to be a traditionist. † Muhammad-b-Ishak-b-Yasfr the freedman of Kays-b-Makhramah. Yasér was one of the prisoners taken al A’ynu't Tamr, sent by Khalid-b-Walid to Abu Bakr at Medina. He is held by the majority of the learned to be a sure authority on tradition and his work the ^ Maghdézi wa’s Siyar (conquests and expeditions) bears a high character. He went to the Caliph Abu Jaa’far al Mansir at Hira and put the Maghazi in writing for his use and the learned of Kufa heard him read and explain that work ; died at Baghdad A. H. 151, (768). Ibn Khall. गर Abu Sa’id al Hasan of Basrah one of the most eminent of the Tabi’is, his mother was a slave of Umm Salimah one of the prophet’s wives. Ile was born at Medina two years before the death of the Caliph Omar and died 81 Basrah A. H. 110 (728). Ibn Khall. § Katidah-b-Dyama as Sadisi, a native of Basrah and one of the Tabi’is, blind from birth, but of the greatest learning, much consulted by the Ummyyad family on points of history, genealogy and poetry, born A. H. 60, (679-80), died at Wasit A. H. 117, (735-6). Ibid. | A village near Mecca, not to be confounded with the valley of Téa or Tawa, according to Sale, where Moses saw the burning bush, (Kur xx.) consult Yakat Mua’j. Bul. [ 29 ] Siddik by the tongue of Gabriel and by the tongue of Muhammad. He was the vicegerent of the Apostle of God in public prayers. He ap- proved him for our spiritual concerns, and we have acquiesced in him for our worldly government.’’ (The authorities for this are good). And Dara- kutni and al Hakim from Abu Yahya.* “It is beyond computation how often I have heard A’li say upon the pulpit that the Lord named Abu Bakr, as Siddik upon the tongue of Gabriel ; and at Tabarani on good unexceptionable authorities from Hakim-b Saa’d, “ I have heard A’li declare and confirm by oath, that God undoubtedly revealed from Heaven, the name of Abu Bakr as as Siddik. wee In the tradition relative to the Battle of Ohud, the prophet said, “Be at peace, for verily unto you there is given a prophet, a witness to the truth and two martyrs.” The mother of Abu Bakr was the daughter of his father’s uncle. Her name was Salma, the daughter of Sakhar, b-A’amir, b-Kaa’b and she received the surname of the “ mother of goodness” (Ummu’l Khayr). On his Nativity and place of birth. He was born two years and some months after the birth of Muhammad for he died when he was sjxty-three years of age. Ibn Kathir gays, that what is recorded by Khalifah-b-u’l Khayyat,t on the authority of Yazid- b-u’l Agamm, ४2६.) that the prophet said to Abu Bakr “ Verily am I the greater or art thou?” and he replied ‘thou art greater, but I am older in years,” is a tradition of an imperfect line of ascription and cited but by one authority, for*the contrary is notorious, and indeed confirmed on the authority of Ibn A’bbas. His birthplace was Mecca which he never left except to trade, and he was the possessor of great wealth in his tribe, and a man of perfect genero- sity, courtesy, and beneficence among them; as Ibn प] Dughannah says, “ Verily thou art affectionate to thy kindred and speakest the truth in what thou narratest, and acquirest what others are denied and givest help in worldly troubles, and art hospitable to the stranger.” An Nawawi says , that he was one of the chiefs of the Kuraysh in the time of Ignorance, and one of their councillors, and beloved among them, and the wisest in * The MS. has Abu’l Hayya. There are no less than eleven of this name given by Ibn Hajr as being acquainted with Muhammad. t+ Abu A’mr surnamed Shabaéb a native of Basrah and author of the Tabakat, was a Hafidh versed in history and of great talents. Al Bukhari gives traditions on his authority, died A. H. 240, (A. 0, 864-5). Consult. Ibn Khall—who omits the def. article before Khayyat. | [ 30 ] the direction of their affairs ; and when the true faith came, he chose it above all things and entered it with the most perfect submission. Az Zubayr-b-Bakkér and Ibn Asdkir record on the authority of Ma’raf- b-Kharrabid, that Abu Bakr as Siddik was one of ten amongst the Kuraysh to whom attached pre-eminence both in the time of Ignorance, and Isl4m: for upon him lay the settlement of blood-money and fines, and that was because the Kuraysh had no king upon whom the direction of all affairs might devolve: moreover in each tribe there existed a general juris- diction exercised by its several chiefs, and to the Banu Hashim pertained the right of कभा and Rifadah,* the meaning of which is, that no one might eat or drink except of their food and their drink; and to the Banu A’bdu’d Dar, the office of door-keeper and guardian of the Kaa’bah, and the Banner and the Council, that is to say, no one might enter the Kaa’bah except with their permission, and when the Kuraysh fastened on the banner of war, the Banu A’bdu’d Dar bound it for them, and when they assembled together for any purpose either to confirm or to annul, their gathering could not take place except in the Hall of Council and nothing could take effect, save done therein and it appertained to the Banu Abdu’d Dar. + Abu Bakr was the most abstinent of men in the time of Ignorance. Ibn A’sakir records with accurate authorities from Ayesha; “ by Allah, Abu Bakr never recited poetry,t whether in the time of ignorance or Islam, and indeed he and Othman forbore from wine even in the time of Ignorance ;’’ and Abn Nua’ym records from her on excellent authority, “ Verily Abu Bakr denied himself wine in the time of Ignorance ;” and Ibn Asakir from Abdu ‘llah-b-u’z Zubayr, “ Abu Bakr never recited a verse ; and from * Rifadah was a contribution which the tribe of the Kuraysh made in the time of Ignorance, for the purpose of purchasing for the pilgrims, wheat and raisins for the beverage called Sas, Each gave according to his ability, and thus they collected a great sum in the days of the assembling of the pilgrims. And thcy continued to feed the pilgrims until the end of those days; the “Sikayah” was the supplying this beverage and Rifadah, these provisions. Lane, + The Kuran though not directly forbidding yet discredits the profession of verse making. &J stay ५) ra glighs le “We have not taught (Muhammad) the art of poetry nor is it expedient for him,’’ Kur. XXXVI. Sale remarks that this was in answer to the infidels who pretended that the Kurdn was only a poetical composi- tion. Again wo res pers: J pan Kur. XXVI. “Those err who follow the steps of the 7068." But the learned have determined that moral, didactic and religious poetry is permissible. There are verses ifnputed to the great Shafi’i in which he declares that were not men of his cloth prohibited from writing poctry, he would have surpassed Labid. [ 31 | Abu’l A’aliyah ar Riahi, that it was asked of Abu Bakr in an assembly of the Companions of the Apostle of God “ didst thou ever drink wine in the time of Ignorance ?” he replied “ God forbid,” and they said, ^ why not ?” He answered, “1 sought to preserve my reputation and retain my decorum, and verily he who drinketh wine destroyeth his reputation and his decorum.” The narrator says that when this reached the apostle of God, he said,” Abu Bakr hath spoken truly Abu Bakr hath spoken truly,” twice. This tradition is wanting in regularity of transmission and is cited, but by one authority both as regards authorities and the text. On his outward description. Ibn Saa’d relates on the authority of Ayesha that a.man said to her, “describe to me Abu Bakr,’ and she replied, “ he was a man of a very fair complexion, of slender build, thin cheeked and with a stoop; he could not keep up his lower garments from slipping over his loins ; he was lean, with eyes deep set, his forehead prominent, and the backs of his hand fleshless. Such is his description. He states also on her authority, that Abu Bakr made use of the tinctures of hinna* and katam ; and on the authority off Anas, that when the apostle of God went to Medina, there was none among the companions with grizzled hair, except Abu Bakr, and he dyed it with hinna and katam, On his embracing the faith. on the authority of Abu Sa’id{ al Khudri, that Abu Bakr said « Have not I the greatest claim among men to it,” that is, the Caliphate; “was not I the first to embrace the faith ? was it not I who did such a thing P was it not I who did such another thing?” And Ibn A’sdkir on the ascription of al Harith from A’li, that he said, “the first who embraced the faith At Tirmidi, and Ibn Habén in his Sahih, (authentic traditions) record ˆ * Lawsonia inermis,—the Katam is a herb which mixed with cypress is used as a tincture. † Abu Sulayt Anas b-Abi Anas, one of the Banu Najjar, he was a companion of Muhammad and fought on his side at Badr. De Slane I. K. ‡ Abu Sa’id Saa’d b-Malik of the tribe of Khudra a Companion and an Ansar of the third class. At the age of 13, he accompanicd his father to Ohud who fell at that battle. The son accompanied Muhammad in twelve expeditions, died at Medina A. H. 74 (698-4). De Slane L. K. [ 8 | among the men was Abu Rakr’’; and Khaythamah* on accurate authorities from Zayd-b-Arkam,f “the first man who prayed with the prophet, was Abu Bakr as Siddik” and Ibn Saa’d on the authority of Abu Arwa ad Dausi the Companion, that the first who embraced Islam was Abu Bakr as Siddik. At Tabarani in his Kabir, and ’Abdu’llah b-Ahmad in the “ Zawaidu’ Zukd,” record on the authority of as Shaa’bif that he said, “I asked Ibn A’bbas what man was the first to embrace Islam ?” he replied, “ Abu Bakr as Siddik. Hast thou not heard the words of Hassan§ where he says? “ When thou rememberest the affliction of a faithful brother, Then remember too thy brother Abu Bakr and what he hath done. The best of men, the most pious and most just of them Save the prophet and the most faithful in performing what he hath undertaken. The second,|| the follower, the place of whose witnessing is extolled And the first among those who have borne witness to the prophets.” Abu Nua’ym records on the authority Furat-b-Saib that he said, “I inquired of Maymun-b-Mihran saying, ‘is Ali the most excellent in thy opinion, or Abu Bakr, or Omar ?’”’ He trembled so that the staff fell from his hand and then replied ‘‘ I never thought that I should live to the time when any one should be compared to those two—to God be attributed their good deeds—they two were the chief in Islim.”’ I said “then was Abu Bakr the first to embrace Islam or Ali?” he answered “ By Allah, verily Abu Bakr believed in the prophet in the time of Bubdyra, the monk on * Abu Khaythamah Zuhayr an eminent traditionist of Nas who settled at Bagh- dad and died A. H. 234 (A. D. 849). De Slane I. K. ¢ One of the Companions, accompanied Muhammad in seventeen expeditions set- tled at Kiifah and died there A. H. 56 or as some say 68, An Nawawi. { Abu Amr A’dmir sprang from Himyar and was accounted a member of the tribe of Hamdan of which Shaa’b isa branch. He held high rank among the Tabi’is and was distinguished for his learning, born about A. H. 19, died A. H. 104 (722). Ibn Khall. § Hassin-b-Thabit was one of the poets who espoused the cause of Muhammad. His son A’bdu’r Rahman lived under Mu’4wiyah and used to address complimentary poems to Ramla, daughter of that Caliph. De Slane I. K. For his elegy on Mubam- mad’s death see Weil. Leben Muhammad. Vol. II, p. 356. || Abu Bakr, is referred to in Kur IX as yd + Lat (> ed “the second of the two when they two were in the cave.” ¶ Mubammad was reclining under a lote tree says Ibn Hajr, while Abu Bakr was conversing with Buhayra. The latter asked him who it was, that was seated there ; he replied that it was Muhammad the son of A’bdu’llah. “Then by Allah, said Buhayra, he is the prophet for none has taken shelter under that tree since the time of Jesus the Son of Mary.’ This impressed itself on Abu Bakr’s mind and was the [ 38 ] the occasion of his meeting him.” Accounts vary as to priority in Islam between him and Khadijah when he procured her marriage with the prophet,* and all this was before A’li was born, and verily there are many among the Companions and their immediate successors, and others who say, that he was the first to embrace Islam, indeed, some of them assert that there is universal assent to this. Again, it is said that A’li was the first to join the true faith, and some say, Khadijah, but there is a reconciliation of these accounts, in that Abu Bakr was the first to embrace the faith among, men, A’li among children and Khadijah among women and the first who pointed out this reconciliation, was Abu Hanifah from whom Na’aym quotes it. Ibn Abi Shaybaht and Ibn A’sakir record on the authority of Sdlim- b-Abi Jaa’d that he said, “I asked of Muhimmad-b-Hanifah,—was Abu Bakr the first of the people to adopt [अद ?' He replied—“ no.” I said, ‘for what reason then is he exalted and preferred, so that no one speaks of any but Abu Bakr?’’ He replied, “because he was the most excellent of them in Isl4m, from the time he embraced the faith until he attained to his 6०१. And Ibn A’sdkir ona reliable ascription from Muhammad- b-Saa’d-b-Abi Wakk4s,t that he said to his father Saa’d,—* was Abu Bakr as Siddik the first of you in embracing the faith?” He said. ^ No, for there were more than five in the faith before him but he was the best of us in Isl4m.” Ibn Kathir says, “it 18 clear that Muhammad’s family believed before every other—his wife Khadijah, his freedman Zayd and the wife of Zayd Umm-i-Ayman and A’li and Warakah.” Ibn A’sakir records on the authority of I’sa-b Yazid that Abu Bakr said, “I was seated in the court- yard of the Kaa’bah where Zayd-b-A’mr-b-Nufayl was sitting, when there passed by him Umayyah-b-Abi Salt§ and he said. ^ How art thou, thou cause of his early conversion. I may add that Ibn Hajr discords as erroncous the opinion held by Ibn Athir (and adopted by Sprenger) that this Buhayra was the same person as the one who figures in a deputation to Muhammad from the king of Abyssi- nia forty years afterwards. * By assisting Muhammad with money on that occasion as is gencrally believed. † The Hafidh Othman a native of Kafah, diced A. H. 239 (A. D. 853-4). He com- posed a commentary on the Kuraén and a collection of traditions: 30,000 persona are said to have attended his lessons. De Slano I. K. ‡ Abt [अक्षः Saa’d-b-Abi Wakkds, a descendant of A’bdu Manét was by his own account the third convert to Isl4m, he being then 17 years of age. He fought in all the prophet’s battles; his death occurred between A. H. 60-8. De Slane I. K. } He was a poet of some reputation of the tribe of Thakif. Ibn Hajr says that he was an enquirer after truth, but more for the curiosity of the discovery than with intent to follow it. ‘‘ His verses,” said Muhammad “ are pious enough but his heart 5 ° [ ॐ J 0 seeker after good ?' He answered “well.” The other said “ hast thou discovered anything?” He replied ‘No:’ then the other said— “Every religion in the day of judgment: save that founded of God in truth, shall perish,” But regarding the prophet, he that men look for, shal] he be from among us or from among you?” Abu Bakr continues, “and I, had not heard before that of a prophet expected who was to be sent.”” He adds. “Then I went out to Waraka’-b-Naufal* and he was one who con- stantly watched the heavens and muttered frequently to himself and I stopped him and related to him the circumstance. He said “ Yea—O! son of my brother, I am skilled in the scriptures and in knowledge ; know, that this prophet, he whom men await, shall be by descent of the most noble of the Arabs. Iam likewise skilled in genealogy, and thy tribe 18 by descent, the most noble among the Arabs.” I[ said. “O uncle, and what will the prophet say?’ He replied, “he shall speak that which hath been said to him, and know, that he shall not oppress nor be oppress- ed nor desire you to oppress each other.” Therefore when the Apostle of God was sent, I believed in him and testified to him.” Ibn Ishdk says, that be heard from Muhammad-b-Abdi’r Rahmén-b- Abdi’llah b-i’l Hagin at Tamimi that the Apostle of God said, “I never ealled any one to the true faith but there arose in him an aversion to it, and an irresolution and deliberation, except Abu Bakr who delayed not from it when I spoke to him, and did not hesitate therein.” Al Bayhaki says “and this was because he had been accustomed to behold the proofs of the prophetic mission of the Apostle of God, and to hear its traditions, before his call, and when ¢he prophet summoned him, then verily thought and deliberation had passed by for him and he at once embraced Islam.’ He then records on the authority Abu Maysaraht that when the Apostle of God went forth, he used to hear one calling to him ^ O Muhammad,” and when he heard the voice he would turn fleeing: he told this in secret to Abu Bakr who was his intimate friend in the time of Ignorance.” Abu Nua’aym and Ibn A’sdkir record on the authority of Ibn A’bbds that the Apostle of God said, “ I never spoke to any one regarding Islam but he denied me and rejected my words, save the son of Abu Kuhadfa and is unbelieving.” There is a doubt whcther he was ever converted, but by some he is considered a Companion. His excuse for not testifying to the prophet was, that he had once hinted to his tribe that he himself was likely to be the prophet to come. * A cousin of Muhammad’s said to have been a convert to Christianity. and to have been acquainted with the Scriptures, and to have transcribed some portions of the Gospels into Hebrew or Arabic. See Muir, Vol. II. p, 61. † The freedman of al A’bbas-b-Abdi’l Muttalib. Ibn Hajr. | ॐ ] verily I never said unto him a thing but he acquiesced in it and was stead- fast therein.” And al Bukhari from Abu’d Darda* that the apostle of God said, “will ye not leave unto me my companion ? verily I said, O! men, I am the apostle of God unto ye all, and ye said “thou liest,” and Abu Bakr said “thou hast spoken truly.” On his companionship with the prophet and the expeditions which he accompanied. The learned say that Abu Bakr accompanied the prophet from the time he embraced Islam to his death, and never separated himself from him either in journeying or residence at home, except when he had per- mission to depart on account of pilgrimage or war; and he was present with him in all his expeditions, and acompanied him in his flight, and for- sook his family and children with cheerfulness for the sake of God and his Apostle, and he was his companion in the cave. The Lord called him, “the second of the two when they two were in the cave” when the prophet said to his companion, “ be not sad for God is with us,” and he assisted the Apostle of God on other occasions. Splendid were his services in the wars: he was steadfast on the day of Ohud and the day of Hunayn when the people fled, as will appear in the chapter on his courage. Ibn A’sakir records on the testimony of Abu Hurayrah, that the angels took part in the battle of Badr and they said “See ye not as Siddik with the Apostle of God in a shed 2”? And Abu Ya’la and al Hakim and Ahmad from A’li that he said, “the Apostle of God said to me and to Abu Bakr on the day of Badr, “ with one of you two is Gabriel and with the other Michael.’ And Ibn A’sdkir from Ibn Sirin, that A’bdu’r Rahman the son of Abu Bakr on the day of Badr was on the side of the idolaters, and when he was converted to Islam, he said to his father,” verily, | thou wert exposed as a mark to me on the day of Badr, but I turned away from thee and did not slay thee.” Abu Bakr said, “as to thee, hadst thou come before me, I should not have turned away from thee.” One of the Companions. The particulars of this narration will be found in Bukhari's as Sahih. Vol. VI, Kitabu’l Manakib. | 36 ] On his bravery, for he was the bravest of the Companions. Al Bazzar records in his Musnad from A’li that he said ; Tell me who is the bravest of men ;” they said “ thouart.” He replied “ Verily I never encountered any one but I was even with him, but tell me, who was the bravest of men?” ‘hey said, “we know not; who is he?” He said ^ Abu Bakr, for verily on the day of Badr, we made for the Apostle of God a . shelter from the sun, and we said, ^ who shall, remain with the Apostle of God lest any of the idolaters fall upon him?” then by Allah, not one of us approached except Abu Bakr who brandished a sword over the head of the Apostle of God; no one attacked him but he attacked him likewise: he is therefore the bravest of men.” Ali said. ‘I saw the Apostle of God assaulted by the Kuraysh, and one threatened him and another shook him violently and they said, “thou art he who makest of the gods, one God ;’’ he added, ‘“‘and by Allah not one of us approached except Abu Bakr who struck one and threatened another and pushed aside another and said “woe unto ye—will ye slay a man who saith—my God is Allah ?” then A’li lifted up the mantle that was on him and wept, so that his beard was wet with tears and he said ‘I conjure ye by Allah, 2० say whether was the true believer* of the family of Pharoah the better or Abu Bakr ?” and the people were silent, and he said, “do ye not answer me? by Allah, a single hour of Abu Bakr is better than a thousand hours of the believer of the family of Pharoah, for that man concealed his faith and this man pro- claimed it.” Al Bukhari records from U’rwah-b-uz Zubayr that he said, “I asked of A’bdu’llah-b-A’mr-b-i’l A’d4s,f what was the greatest violence that the idolaters had offered to the Apostle of God; he replied “ I saw U’kbah-b- Abi Mua’yt go towards the prophet who was praying and throw his cloak about his neck, and throttle him violently, whereupon Abu Bakr came and drove him from him and said, “^ will ye slay a man who saith—my God is * This person, according to tradition, was an Egyptian and Pharosh’s uncle's son, but a true belicver, who finding that the king had been informed of what Moses had done, and designed to put him to death, gave him notice to provide for his safety by flight. He is mentioned in the Kuran. Chapters XXVIII and XL. 866 Sale. † Abu Muhammad or Abu A’bdu’r Rahman, the Companion. An Nawawi says that the name A’dés commonly so spelt, should be more properly written us ws Qs + Called ४,५५.० Sys or the ten to whom joyful tidings are given. See note, page 25. ‡ Those whom he called together al Hudaybiyah and who swore to be faithful to him till death. § Abu Mansur A’bdu’l Kéhir a native of Baghdad, a dogmatic theologian of the Shafi’i school, well acquainted with general literature and versed in a number of other sciences particularly arithmetic; a book of his on the latter bears the name of at ‘Takmila. He was likewise skilled in the law of inheritance and composed poetry, died at Isfardin A. H. 429, (A. 7. 1037-8) and was interred by the grave of his master Abu Ish&k. Ibn Khall. [ 45 ] At Tirmidi records from Jabir-b-A’bdu’llah* that Omar said to Abu Bakr “0 best of men after the Apostle of God,’ and Abu Bakr replied— ` nay, thou if thou speakest thus, then verily, I have heard the prophet say “the sun hath never risen upon a man better than Omar.” And al Bukhari from A’li-b-Abi Talib, ‘I said to my father—who among men is the best after the Apostle of God?” He replied “Abu Bakr.” I said “who after him,” he replied “Omar,” and I feared lest he should say Othman. I continued “then thou.’ He answered “ I am nothing but one. among the true believers.” And Ahmad and others from A’li, “ the best of this people after its prophet is Abu Bakr and then Omar.” Ad Dahabi says “this hath come down in regular transmission from A’li, therefore may God curse the hereticst how ignorant are they !” At Tirmidi and al Hakim record on the authority of Omar-b-u’l Khattab that he said, “ Abu Bakr is our chief andthe most excellent of us, and the most beloved among us of the Apostle of 6०५. And Ibn A’sé- kir from Abdu’r Rahmanf-b-Abi Layla, that Omar ascended the pulpit and said, “know that the most eminent of this people after its prophet is Abu Bakr, and whosoever speaketh otherwise is a slanderer: upon him be the retribution that overtaketh the slanderer,’’ and that A’li said, “let not any one prefer me in merit to Abu Bakr or Omar, or I shall scourge him according to the punishment of the law for the slanderer.”’ Abdu’r Rahman-b-Hamid in his Musnad, and Abu Nua’ym and others, record with different authorities from Abu’d Darda, that the Apostle of God said, ‘ The sun hath never risen and hath never gone down upon one more eminent than Abu Bakr, save he were a prophet ;” and in another reading ^ upon one of the true believers, after the prophets and Apostles, more eminent than Abu Bakr.’’ And the same from the tradition of Jabir with the reading “ The sun hath never risen upon one amongst you more eminent than he.’’ At Tabardni and others record this and it has evi- dences from other sources which determine its accuracy or trustworthiness and indeed Ibn Kathir hath pointed out its absolute authenticity. * Abu A’bdu’llah Jabir-b-A’bdi'llah as Salami-al Ansdri, embraced Isl4m one year before the first pact, made with Muhammad al Akaba (Abul Feda, Tom 1, pago 68) and was present at the second; died A. H. 78 (A. D. 697-8) aged ninety-four years. De Slane, I. K. + The Shiahs and such as maintain the pre-eminence of Ali over his three predecessors. t Abu I’sa A’bdu’r Rahman ono of the principal Tabi’is born at Kufah where his father had settled,6 ycare before Omar's death. He died A. H. 83, An Nawawi. [ 46 ] At Tabarani records from Salimah-b-u’l A’kwaa’* that the Apostle of God said “ Abu Bakr as Siddik is the most eminent of men, save it be a prophet ;’”’ and in his Ausat from Saa’d-b-Zurarah, that the Apostle of God said, “The holy spirit Gabriel announced to me,—“ the best of thy people after thee is Abu Bakr.” And the two Shaykhs from A’mr-b-u’l A’ds, “I said ‘O Apostle of God, who among mankind is the most beloved by thee?’ He replied “ Ayesha.” I said “among men?” “Her father.” I said “then who?” he replied. ‘Then Omar-b-u’l Khattéb.” This tradition without the ‘then Omar’ has come down in the narrative of Anas and Ibn Omar and Ibn A’bbas. At Tirmidi, an Nas4i,t and al Hakim record on the authority of A’bdu’llah-b-Shakik that he narrates, “I said to Ayesha—which of the Com- panions of the Apostle of God was most beloved by him?” She answered “Abu Bakr.” I said “which next ?” She replied “Then Omar” I said ^“ which next ?” She answered Abu U’baydah-b-u'l Jarrah.” And at Tir- midi from Anas, that the Apostle of God said of Abu Bakr and Omar, < These are the chief of the adult dwellers in paradise, of those who have been the first and of those who will be the last, save they be prophets and Apostles.” f At Tabar&ni records in his Ausat on the authority of A’mmar-b- Yasir§ that he said, ^ whosoever giveth precedence to any one of the Companions of the Apostle of God over Abu Bakr and Omar, verily he putteth a slight upon the Fugitives and Auxiliaries.” And Ibn Said on * Salimah-b-u’l A’kwaa’, one of the Companions. He swore allegiance to Muham- mad on the day of Hudaybiyah and accompanied him in seven of his expeditions. He used to reside at Medina, but on the death of Omar, ho left it for Rabadah and returned to Medina a few days before his death, A. H. 74 (693) at the age of 80. An Nawawi. † The पअ), Abu A’bdu’r Rahman, chief traditionist of his age and author of a Sunan or collection of traditions, was an inhabitant of old Cairo., He was a great advocate of the rights of A’li and was maltreated by the mob on that account, under the effects of which he died A. H. 303, (A. D. 916). Born at Nasa a city of Khora- sin A. H. 214-5. (A. D. 829-30). He composed a work called the Al Khasdis (cha- ractcristics) on the merits of Ali. Ibn Khall. ‡ The Muhammadan doctors placethe Apostles higher in degree than the prophets. The two words ne 0, 3 ^ prophet apostle,’ are employed only for those who bear the double character. By the latter they signify, one whose divine mission is testified to by a sacred book whereas the prophetical office alone is not always so distinguished. The Prophet Apostles are four, Moses, David, Jesus, Muhammad. § One of the Companions, who fell in the battle fought (A. H. 37) botween A’li and Mu’awiyah at Siffin. Ibn Khall, | 17 | the authority of az Zuhri,* that the Apostle of God said to Hassén-b- Thabit. «^ Hast thou said anything in verse of Abu Bakr ?”? He answered “yes,” Then he said “speak and I will listen,” and he repeated this verse— “The second of the two in the glorious cave and verily The encmy went round about it when they ascended the mountain And verily they knew that he was the beloved of the Apostle of God: Who held no one his equal among the people.”’ | and the Apostle of God laughed so that his back teeth were visible, and said, “‘ thou hast spoken truly, O Hassan, he is as thou sayest.” Ahmad and at Tirmidi record from Anast-b- Malik that the Apostle of God said, “The most compassionate of my people unto my people is Abu Bakr, and the most zealous of them in upholding the commands of God, Omar, and the most truly modest among them, Othman, and the most learned of them in things lawful and unlawful Mu’dd-b-Jabal, and the most skilled in the law of inheritance, Zayd-b-Thabit,t and the most learned of them in the Kuran Ubayy-b-Kaa’b,§ and in every people, there is one that is confided in, and the trusted one of this people is Abu U’baydah- b-u’l Jarrah.” Abu Ya’la has taken this from the tradition of Ibn Omar and added to it “and the best of them in adjudication, A’li.” Ad Daylami quotes this in his Musnad प] Firdaus from the tradition of Shadd4d-b-Aus * Abu Bakr Muhammad Ibn Shihdb of the Kuraysh, one of the most eminent of the Tabi‘is, jurisconsults and traditionists of Medina. He saw ten of Muhammad’s Companions. He was made Kadhi by Yazid-b-Abdi’l Malik and died A. H. 124 (A. D. 742) at the age of seventy-two or three. Ibn Khall. † Abu Hamzah, Anas-b-Malik surnamed “the servant of God’s Apostle.” al Sy) pola was one of the most eminent of the Companions. At his mothcr’s request Muhammad prayed for his spiritual and temporal prosperity, through which the riches of Anas multiplied, his date trees bore fruit twice a year and he was the father of 78 sons; he was 10 years in his master’s service and on his death removed to Basrah, He dicd A. H. 93 (A. D. 711-2). De Slane, I. K. ‡ Abu Sa’id-Zayd-b-Thabit a Companion and native of Mcdina. He was Mu- hammad’s Secretary and used to commit his dictation of the Kurdn to writing and carried on his master’s ordinary, correspondence and aftcrwards acted in the same cupa- city under Abu Bakr and Omar. He was one of the three to whom Abu Bakr com- mitted the task of collecting the Kuran. He was celebrated for his knowledge of the law of inheritance among other subjccts and had the charge of the public treasury in the Caliphate of Othmdn. He died at Medina A. H. 64. An Nawawi. § One of the Companions, present at the second pact of al A’kabah; fought at Badr and other engagements. Muhammad recited to him the 98th Sura of the Kurén as he said, at the express divine command, an honour which no other Companion shared with him: १८ at Mcdina before A. H. 30 in the Caliphate of Othman. An Nawawi, T. A. [ 48 ] and added “and Abu Darr,* the most devout of my people and the most sincere, and Abu’d Darda, the most pious of my people, and the most God- fearing and Mu’dwiyah-b-Abi Sufyan, the most benign of my people and the most munificent.” And verily my most erudite master Al Kafijit was asked whether these characteristics were at variance with those before given, and he replied that there was no contradiction. On what has been revealed in the verses of the Kurdan in his praise and his witnessing to the truth and other matters regarding him. Know, that I have seen a work of a certain author on the names of those regarding whom there hath been a revelation in the Kuran, but in- accurate and incomplete and, I therefore myself composed a work on that subject, comprehensive, exhaustive and accurate and I extract from it here, whatever refers to As Siddik. The Lord said, “The second of the two when they two were in the cave : when he said unto his Companion, ‘‘ be not grieved for God is with us. And God sent down his security upon him.” (Kur. ९. ix.) The true believers are agreed that the Companion mentioned is Abu Bakr, and there will appear a tradition from him on this subject. Ibn Abi Hatim records from Ibn A’bbas concerning the divine words “and God sent down his security upon him,” that he said, “that is, upon Abu Bakr, for as to the prophet, the security never ceased to be with him.” And from Ibn Masa’td,{ that Abu Bakr purchased Bilal§ from Umayyah- b-Khalaf and Ubayy-b-Khalaf, for a cloak and ten pieces of money and he set him free for the sake of God: then God revealed. “By the night when it covereth” (Kur XCII) to the words “verily your endeavour is different” that 25 the endeavour of Abu Bakr and Umayyah and Ubayy. Ibn Jarir records from A’amir-b-A’bdu’'lah-b-iz Zubayr that Abu Bakr used to give manumissign in Meccato slaves of the true faith, and thus * Jundub-b-Junddah Abu Darr Ali Ghaffari, one of the Companions of an ascetic life and one of the earliest converts. There is much variance of opinion regarding his real name. He died at Rabadah a village three miles from Medina A. H. 82. For particulars of his life consult Ibn Hajr, and an Naw. न This name is written Kafiaji by by Meursinge. See Introduction. ¶{ A’bdu’llah-b-Masa’id-b-Ghafil. A eminent Cémpanion and one of the Fugitives both to Abyssinia and Medina and a trusty confidant of Muhammad’s whom he accompanied on all his expeditions. Some say he died at Kifah, others, at Medina about A. H. 32, being ५ little more than sixty years of age. An Nawawi. § Mulhammad’s Abyssinian caller to prayer. [ 49 | he used to set free old women and other women when they embraced Islam and his father said to him, “0 my son, I see that thou freest weak woinen, but if thou wert to free strong men, they would stand by thee and protect thee, and repel harm from thee.” He replied, “O father I desire the things which are of God.” He adds “I was told by some of my family that this verse was revealed concerning him “now who is obedient and feareth God” (Kur XCII)—to the end Ibn Abi Hatim and at Tabarani record from U’rwah that Abu Bakr freed seven slaves, all of whom had suffered persecution for the sake of God and regarding him was revealed, “ but he who strictly bewareth idolatry and rebellion shall be removed, far from the same’ to the end of the Sura (Kur. XCII). Al Bazzar records from A’bdu’llah-b-u’z-Zubayr, that this verse, “by whom no benefit is bestowed on any that it may be recompens- ed,” to the end, (Kur. XCII) was revealed concerning Abu Bakr ; and al Bukhari records from Ayesha that Abu Bakr never violated an oath until God revealed the atonement for an oath violated (Kur. V). Al Bazzar and Ibn A’sdkir record from Usayd-b-Safwan (who enjoyed the Companionship of the prophet) that A’li said, “ and he who brought the truth was Muhammad and Abu Bakr as Siddik testified to him.” Ibn A’sakir says, “ this is the tradition regarding this reading but perhaps it is a reading of A’li’s.* Al Hakim records from Ibn A’bbas regarding the words of God, ‘and consult them in the affair” (Kur. III.), that they were revealed con- cerning Abu Bakr and Omar. And Ibn Abi Hatim from Ibn Shaudab that the verse “but for him who dreadeth the tribunal of his Lord are prepared two gardens,” (Kur. LV), was revealed regarding Abu Bakr, and there are other ascriptions which 1 have mentioned in the Reasons of Revelation At Tabarani records in his Ausat from Ibn Omar and Ibn A’bbas that the divine words “and the good man among the faithful” (Kur. LX VI) were revealed concerning Abu Bakr and Omar. And A’bdu'llah-b-Abi Hamid in his Commentary, from Mujahid,f+that when “verily God and his angels bless the prophet” (Kur. XX XIII) was revealed, Abu Bakr said, “© Apostle of God! God hath never revealed to thee a blessing but he hath included me in 10. Then was revealed this verse “it is he who is gracious to you and his angels zntercede for you.” (Kur. XXXITI1.) * That is with the words ^. ए] Hakk.”. The word in the Kuran is “ Sidk’ and not “ Hakk” —( 3.009 (६५.८८ Sla Syl Kur, XX XIX t The celebrated Im4m and Tavi'i Abu'l Hajjiéj Mujéhid-b-Jubayr, was a doctor of high authority on jurisprudence and Kuranic interpretation. A’bdu’llah-b-Omar respected him to such a degree that he held his stirrup when he mounted on horse- back, died A. H. 101, (A. D. 719-20). De Slane I. K. 7 [ 50 J Ibn A’sékir records from ’Ali-b-u’l Husayn, that the following verse was revealed regarding Abu Bakr, Omar and A’li, “and we will remove all grudges from their breasts; they shall be as brethren sitting over against one another on couches” (Kur. XV); and from Ibn A’bbas, that, ^: we have commanded man ६0 show kindness to his parents” down to the words “this 18 a true promise which they are promised zn this world” (Kur. XLVI) was revealed regarding Abu Bakr ag Siddik; and from Ibn U’aynah,* that God had chided all the true believers through the Apostle of God, except Abu Bakr alone who had escaped from the reproach : and he recites the words “if ye assist not the prophet, verily God will assist him as He assisted him formerly when the unbelievers drove him out of Afecca, the second of the two when they two were in the cave.” (Kur. IX) On the traditions handed down regarding his merit coupled with that of Omar over and above what has preceded, The two Shaykhs record from Abu Hurayrah that he said, “I heard the Apostle of God say, “ whilst a shepherd was in the midst of his flock, a wolf rushed upon it and carried off from it a sheep and the shepherd pur- sued it. The wolf turned to him and said “who 1०८८ be क protector to it on the day of resurrection?—the tay when there will be no other shep- herd than myself ;”’+ and as a man was driving an ox which he had laden, it turned to him and spake and said “verily I was not created for this, but I was created for tillage’ and the people cried out. ‘ Good God, that an ox should talk !’’ The prophet said, “I believe in it and likewise do Abu Bakr and Omar; and Abu Bakr and Omar were not there, that is, they were not present in the assembly, but he bore witness for them both as to their belief in it, because of his knowledge of the perfection of their faith.” At Tirmidi records from Abu Sa’id al Khudri, that the Apostle of God said, ^“ there was never a prophet but he had two ministers from the dwellers in heaven, and two ministers from among the dwellers on earth, * Abu Muhammad Sufyén b-U’aynah, born at Kifah A. H. 107 and taken by his father to Mecca where he died A. H. 198 (814 A.D.) He was an Imam of learning, piety and of a mortified life, distinguished for the exactitude of the traditions which he handed down. Ibn Khall. † “‘Saba’” in YakGt (Mua’jam प Buldan) is a valley in Palestine in which tradition says, mankind will be assembled for the judgment. This very tradition is quoted in proof—but it also stated that there are other interpretations—what they are I cannot discover. In Kustulani’s commentary on al Bukhdri this tradition is noted but without explanation. See also Lane. art, @-+ [ 51 | , and my two ministers of the dwellers in heaven, are Gabriel and Michael, and my two ministers of the dwellers on earth are Abu Bakr and Omar.” The Traditionists and others record from Sa’id-b-Zayd, “I heard the Apostle of God say, “ Abu Bakr shall be in paradise and Omar shall be in paradise, and Othman shall be in paradise and A’li shall be in paradise,”’ and he mentioned the whole of the ten ;* and Al Tirmidi from Abu Sa’id “verily the dwellers in the lofty mansions (of paradise)—they that are below them shall see them as ye see the stars shining in the horizon of the sky, and verily Abu Bakr and Omar shall be among them ;” and from Anas, that the Apostle of God went out to his Companions, of the Fugi- tives and Auxiliaries, and there were seated among them Abu Bakr and Omar, but none of them raised his eyes to him except Abu Bakr and Omar, and they remained gazing upon him and he upon them, and smiling upon him and he upon them. Al Tirmidi and al Hakim record from Ibn Omar that the Apostle of God went forth one day and entered the mosque, with Abu Bakrand Omar, one of them upon his right hand and the other upon his left, and he held their hands and said, “ thus shall we arise on the day of judgment;”’ and at Tirmidi from Ibn Omar, that the Apostle of God said, “ I shall be the first from whom the earth shall be rent asunder, then Abu Bakr and then Omar ;” and he and al Hakim record, confirming it on the authority of Ibn Handhalah that the prophet looked upon Abu Bakr and Omar and paid, “ these are my hearing and my sight.” Al Bazzdr, and al Hakim record from Abu Arwa ad Dausi,f that he said, ^ I was with the prophet when Abu Bakr and Omar approached and he said “ praise be to God who hath strengthened me with ye two.” And Abu Ya’la from A’mmar-b-Yasir, that the Apostle of God said, “a little while ago, Gabriel came to me and I said “O Gabriel, recount unto me the merits of Omar b-u’l Khattéb,”’ and he answered “ if I were to relate to thee the merits of Omar, the narration of his merits would not be ended during the period in which Noah tarried with his people, for verily Omar is a good work amongst the good works of Abu Bakr ;” and Ahmad from A’bdu’r Rahman-b-Ghanam, that the Apostle of God said to Abu Bakr and Omar “if you were agreed upon a counsel, I would not oppose you.” a * See page 25. Notet + Ibn Hajr can give no account of this person beyond the mention of one or two traditions (including this with a slightly different reading) on his authority. His name and genealogy are unknown—he is supposed to have been present with tho prophet at the affair of “Karkarat ए1 Kudr” and died at the close of Mu’awiyah’ reign. र ‘ [ 52 |] Ibn Saa’d relates on the authority of Ibn Omar that he was asked who used to give decisions in the time of the Apostle of God, and he replied, “ Abu Bakr and Omar, and I know of no others besides those two ;” and from Abu’l Kasim-b-Muhammad, that Abu Bakr, Omar, Othm4n and A’li used to decide cases in the time of the Apostle of God; and at Tabardni, from Ibn Masa’id that the Apostle of God said, “every prophet hath a chosen one among his people, and verily my elect from among my Com- panions, are Abu Bakr and Omar;” and Ibn A’sdkir from A’li that the Apostle of God said, “may God have mercy upon Abu Bakr who hath given me his daughter in marriage, and bore me to the city of refuge (Medina) and gave freedom to Bilal—may God have mercy upon Omar who ever speaketh the truth though it be bitter, for the speaking of the \ truth hath left him without a friend—may God have mercy upon Othman \\before whom the angels are abashed—may God have mercy upon A’li— 0 God encompass him with the truth whithersoever he goeth.” And at Tabarani records from Sahl that when the prophet returned from his last pilgrimage, he ascended the pulpit and blessed God and glorified Him and said, ‘O people,’ verily Abu Bakr hath never done me a wrong, therefore know this of him. 0 people, verily I am content with . him and with Omar and Othman and A’li and Talhah and az Zubayr and Saa’d and Abdu’r Rahman-b-A’uf,* and the First Fugitives,t know this of them.” A’bdu’llab b-Ahmad records in the ^ Zawdid u’z Zuhd” from Ibn Abi Hazim, that a man came to A’li-b-u’l Husayn and said, “ what place did Abu Bakr and Omar hold near the Apostle of God?” He replied “ that which they hold at this moment.” And Ibn Saa’d from Bistém-b-Muslim, that the Apostle of God said to Abu Bakr and Omar, ९ ०0 one shall have authority over you two-after me;” and Ibn A’sdakir, a tradition relat- ing direct to the prophet through Anas, “love towards Abu Bakr and Omar is faith, hatred towards them is infidelity ;” and from Ibn Masa’id, “love towards Abu Bakr and Omar anda knowledge of them is an in- junction of the law :” and from Anas, direct from the prophet, “ verily I hope for the same benefit to my people, by their profession of love towards Abu Bakr and Omar, that I hope for them by their profession of faith “ there is no God but God.” * Abu Muhammad A’bdu’r Rahmén b-A’uf of the Kuraysh a native of Medina, one of the ten to whom paradise was assured, died A. H. 32, aged 72. An Nawawi. + The first fugitives to Abyssinia who were driven by the persecution of the Kuraysh to seek shelter with the king (Najashi) of that country. There were cleven in number, and four of them were accompanied by their wives. See Muir's Life of Mu- hammad, Vol. I, p. 133. [ ॐ 1. On the traditions handed down referring exclusively to his merit, over and above what has preceded. The two Shaykhs record on the authority of Abu Hurayrah that he said, “I heard the Apostle of God say,” he who repeatedly* giveth of the things that are his, for the sake of God, shall be summoned through the gates of paradise in these words : “‘O servant of God, this is good for thee to enter by,” and he who is of those who pray, shall be summoned through the Gate of Prayer, and he who is of those who have fought for the faith, shall be summoned through the Gate of Religious War, and he who is of those who give in alms, shall be summoned through the Gate of Alms, and he who is of those who fast shall be summoned through the Gate of Fast- ing—that ist the Gate of Satiety.” Then Abu Bakr said, “it cannot be necessary that one should be summoned though these gates—shall, then, one be summoned through them all?” And he answered, “ yes, and I hope that thou wilt be among them, O Abu Bakr ;”? and Ibn Dautd and al Hakim from Abu Hurayrah that the Apostle of God said, “ but thou, O Abu Bakr, shall be the first of my people to enter paradise ;” and the two Shaykhs from Abu Sa’id that the Apostle of God said, “ he who hath laid me under the greatest obligation of all men both with his person and his goods, is Abu Bakr, and if I were to take a friend other than my Lord, I would surely take Abu Bakr, but the brotherhood of the faith ¢s sufficient.” Al Bukhari records on the authority of Abu’d Darda that he said, “ I was sitting with the prophet when there came forward Abu Bakr, and greeted bim and said, “ verily a dispute arose between me and Omar and I was hasty with him, but afterwards I repented and besought him to forgive me, but he refused, wherefore I have come to thee,” and he said “ May God have mercy upon thee,O Abu Bakr” three times. Afterwards, verily Omar repented and went to the house of Abu Bakr, but found him not, and he hastened to the prophet and the face of the prophet became flushed with wrath so that Abu Bakr was afraid, and he fell upon his knees and said twice, “O Apostle of God, I was more intemperate than he.” The prophet exclaimed ¢o the bystanders “verily, the Lord sent me unto you as a pro- phet, and you said, “thou liest,” and Abu Bakr said, “ thou hast spoken truly,”’ and he comforted me with the service of his person and his goods ; then will ye not leave me to me my Companion °” this he said twice and * My authorities for this sense of the word ..,:>9) are Turbushti and Tibi, 866 the Commentary of Kustulani on this tradition. + The MS. omits “the Gate of Fasting.” The printed text is correct here: the words eyed wl ७० being in al Bukhéri—where it is explained as I have translated it, [ 54 ] after that he was troubled no more.” Ibn A’di records a similar account from the tradition of Ibn Omar in which is the following, “the Apostle of God said,” afflict me not in my Companion, for verily the Lord sent me as as a guide unto salvation and the true faith and you said, “ thou hast lied,” and Abu Bakr said, “ thou hast spoken truly,” and had it not been that the Lord had named him “ Companion,” verily I would have taken him as an intimate friend but the brotherhood of Islam ts sufficient.” And Ibn A’sakir from al Mikdam* that A’kilt the son of Abu Talib, and Abu Bakr were reviling each other and he adds that Abu Bakr used to be a great reviler as well as a great genealogist but that he had learned courtesy of manner from his Companionship with the prophet and he turned away from A’kil and complained to the prophet, and the Apostle of God rose up before the people and said, “ will ye not leave unto me my Companion, what is your worth and his? By Allah there is not a man among you, but darkness is upon the door of his house, save the door of Abu Bakr, and verily upon his door, there is light—and by Allah, verily ye said ६0 me, “ thou hast lied,” and Abu Bakr said “thou hast spoken truly,” and ye withheld your pos- sessions, but he gave unto me that which he had, and ye reviled me, but he cherished me and followed me.”” And al Bukhari from Ibn Omar that the Apostle of God said, “he who traileth his garments haughtily, the Lord will not look upon him on the day of judgment,”’ and Abu Bakr said “should either of the two sides of my garment trail loosely, must I be careful of that ?”? The Apostle of God replied “ thou art not he who doeth that in pride.” And Muslim from Abu Hurayrah, that the Apostle of God said, “who among you hath begun the day fasting ?’? And Abu Bakr replied “I have ;”’ then he said ‘‘ who among you hath fed the poor to-day?” Abu Bakr replied “I;” then he said, “ who among you, hath visited the sick to-day,” and Abu Bakr replied “1;’’ then the Apostle of God said “these things shall not come together in a man, but he shall enter paradise.” Verily this tradition hath been handed down through the narration of Anas-b-Malik and Abdu’r Rahman-b-Abi Bakr, andt has mentioned this tradition of Anas and at the end of it “ paradise shall surely be thy portion.” And al Bazzar records the tradition of A’bdu’r * Al Mikdim-b-Ma’di Karib, one of the Companions—he resided at Emessa, and related forty-seven traditions regarding his master, died in Syria A. H. 87 at the age of 91. An Nawawi. ¢ Abu Yazid or Abu Isa the 2nd son of Abu T4lib; he fought unwillingly on the side of the infidels al Badr, and was taken prisoner and was converted before Huday- biyah. He was a distinguished genealogist, He was quick in repartee says an Nawawi, and generally silenced his antagonist. He died in the Caliphate of Mu’é- wiyah, having lost his sight—and was buried at al Bakii’ the cemetery at Medina. ‡ The MS. has here a blank and the printed text does not supply the omission. [ 55 |] Rahman and its words are these, “the Apostle of God read the prayers in the morning: then he turned to his Companions and said ^ who, among you, hath begun the day fasting?’ Omar replied ‘O! Apostle of God, I did not purpose to myself, during the past night, to fast, thus I have become this morning as one who hath broken his fast,’* and Abu Bakr said “but I purposed to myself during the night to fast, and thus I have risen fasting.” Then the prophet said “ Hath any among you visited the sick to-day ?’? and Omar replied, “O Apostle of God, we have not gone forth from here, how then can we have visited the sick ?”? but Abu Bakr said “ I heard that my brothert A’bdu'r Rahman-b-A’uf was sick and I went round that way to him, to see how he was this morning.” Then he said “hath any one among you fed the poor to-day ?” and Omar replied “we have been praying, O Apostle of God, and have not gone forth,” but Abu Bakr said, “I entered the mosque when, behold! there came a beggar, and I found a piece of barley bread in the hand of Abdu’r Rahman and I took it and gave it to him,” and he said, ^^ Rejoice with the good tidings of paradise ;” then he spoke a word which comforted Omar, and Omar knew that he should never purpose to do a good work but Abu Bakr would be before him in it.” Abu Ya’la records from Ibn Masa’iid, that he said “I was in the mosque praying when there entered the Apostle of God, and with him Abu Bakr and Omar and he found me praying and he said, ^ ask—it shall be granted unto you,” then he said “ whosoever wishes to read the Kuran in a fresh and joyous manner, let him read it with the reading of the son of Umm A’bd.”t Then I returned to my house and Abu Bakr came to me and gave me the good tidings regarding what the prophet had said; then came Omar and he found Abu Bakr going forth, having already been before him and he said ^^ verily thou art the foremost in good.”” Ahmad records on good authority from Rabii’h-u’'l Aslami,§ that he said, “a disputation arose between me and Abu Bakr, when he said to me a word which I disliked, and he repented and said to me, “ O Rabii’h return it to me likewise, so that there may be retaliation.” I replied “I shall not do so.’’ He answered “Thou shalt say it or I shall call up against thee, the Apostle of God.” * The mere act of abstaining from food during the day, does not constitute a fast religiously speaking. The intention to fast, must precede the abstention to make it efficacious. During the long fast of the Ramadhan the intention is pre-supposed and need not be daily renewed, | + The term brother is, as is well-known, applied to all of a tribe indiscriminately without reference to consanguinity. { The mother of Ibn Masa’id. § Rabii’h-b-Kaa’b-b-M4lik al Aslami Hijazi, one of the Companions, settled at Medina and died at Harrah in A. H. 63. Ibn Hajr. [ 36 ] I said, “I will not do so,’? and Abu Bakr departed and there came some men of the tribe of Aslam and they said to me, ^ may God have mercy upon Abu Bakr! for what reason hath he called up against thee the pro- phet, he being the one that hath said to thee what 06 hath said?” And I replied, “know ye not who is Abu Bakr as Siddik ? he is the “ second of the two’’—and he is the grey beard of the Muslims—look to yourselves that he turn not and see ye abetting me against him, lest he be angered and the Apostle of God come and be wroth on account of his anger, and the Lord be wrathful on account of the anger of those two, and Rabii’h perish ;’? and Abu Bakr departed and I followed him alone until he came to the Apostle of God and he related to him the story as it occurred: then the prophet lifted up his head towards me and said,” O Rabii’h, what hath happened between thee and as Siddik?’’ I replied, “O Apostle of God such and such a thing happened and he said to me a word which I disliked, then he said to me, “ speak to me as I have spoken, so that there may be a retaliation,” and I refused.’’ Then the Apostle of God said “ good, do not return it, but say ^ the Lord have mercy upon thee, O Abu Bakr :’” then I said “the Lord have mercy upon thee O Abu Bakr.” Al Tirmidi records and approves a tradition on the authority of Ibn Omar, that the Apostle of God said to Abu Bakr ^ Thou shalt be my Companion at the Pool,* as thou wert my Companion in the Cave; and A’bdu’llah-b-Ahmad from Ibn A’bbas,¢ that the Apostle of God said, ^ Abu Bakr was my Companion and my Comforter in the cave ;” and al Bayhaki from Hudayfaht that the Apostle of God said “verily there is a bird in paradise whose flesh tasteth like that of Bactrian Camels ;’? Abu Bakr said, “it is then delicate of flavour, 0 Apostle of God”—he replied, “he who eateth of them shall enjoy them and thou shalt be of those who shall eat of them:” and Abu Ya‘la from Abu Hurayrah, that the Apostle of God said, ^“ ] was borne towards the heavens, and I passed no heaven, but I found therein my name, Muhammad the Apostle of God and Abu Bakr as Siddik as my vicegerent.” Its authorities are weak, but the same has been handed down in the tradition of Ibn A’bbds, Ibn Omar, Anas, Abu * Salsabil, the fountain in paradise where the prophet is believed to give drink to the faithful who are thirsty. + Theso words ‘‘ from Ibn Abbas’’ are omitted in the printed edition but supplied by the MS. t Abu A’bdu’llah Hudayfah-b-u’l Yaman. He and his father wore both at the battle of Ohud when his father was accidentally killed by his own side. He was much trusted by Muhammad and employed on sccret and important negotiations. He was engaged in the campaign of Nuhawand and commanded the troops at the capture of Hamadan, Ray and Dinawar. Omar made him governor of Maddin where he died in A. H. 36, forty days after the assassination of Omur. An Nawawi, T. A. [ ॐ | 8६१११ and Abu’ d Darda with weak ascriptions, but supporting each other reciprocally. Abu Abi Hatim and Abu Nua’ym record on the authority of Sa’id-b- Jubayr* that he said, “1 was reading this verse before the prophet—“ Oh thou soul which art at rest,” (Kur. LX X XIX), when Abu Bakr said “ 0 Apostle of God surely this is a good saying,’’ and the Apostle of God replied, ‘“ yea, verily, the angel shall say it to thee at the time of thy death.”’ And Ibn Abi Hatim from A’amir-b-Abdi’llah-b-i’2 Zubayr that he said, that when the verse, “and if we had commanded them, saying, slay your- selves,” (Kur. IV) was revealed, Abu Bakr said, “O Apostle of God, didst thou command me to slay myself, I would do so,’’ and he replied “ thou speakest truly.” And Abu’l Kasim al Baghawi from Ibn Abi Mulaykah, “the Apostle of God and his Companions went into a pool and he com- manded that every man should swim towards his friend ;”’ he adds, ^ and every man swam until there were left the Apostle of God and Abu Bakr, and the Apostle of God swam towards Abu Bakr and embraced him and said, “ were I to choose an intimate friend until such time as I saw the Lord face to face, verily I would take Abu Bakr, but he is my Companion.”” Wakii’t has followed him on the authority of A’bdu’l Jabbar-b-u’l Ward, (states Ibn A’sakir,) and Abdu’l Jabbar. is trustworthy, and his master, was the Imam Ibn Abi Mulaykah but it is irregular in transmission and narrated but by one authority. I remark that at Tabarani has recorded it in the ^ Kabir’ and Ibn Shahin in the “ Sunnat” in a different manner, but in uninter- rupted succession from Ibn A’bbas. Ibnt{ Abi’d Dunya reeords in the “ Makarimu’l Akhlak,” (noble qualities) and Ibn A’sakir, according to the ascription of Sadakah-b-Maymiun al Karashi, from Sulayman-b-Yasar,§ * Abu A’bdu’llah or Muhammad Sa’id-b-Jubayr-b-Hisham al Asadi was a black and a client by enfranchisement to the tribe of Waliba-b-u’l Harith. He was an emi- nent Tabi’i and a native of Kufah. He learnt his traditions from Ibn Omar and Ibn A’bbés. He was put to death by Hajjaj-b- Yusuf for his revolt against Abdu’l Malik-b- Marwan, and the last hours of Hajjaj were said to have been tormentcd by his victim’s apparition. His death took place in A. H. 95 (A. D. 714) and was followed in the same year by that of his murderer. Ibn Khall. t Abu Sufiyan Wakii’-b-u’l Jarrah, born at Kufah A. H. 129 an eminent juris- consult and traditionist. He studied under Abu Hanifah and used to decide points of law. He made the pilgrimage 70 times and on returning from the last, he died at Fayd, a town midway between Mecca and Kifah A. H. 197 (A. D. 812-3). De Slane, I. K. { Abu Bakr A’bdu’llah-b-Muhammad-b-U’bayd a member by adoption, of the Kuraysh, and surnamed Ibn Abi’ d Dunya, composed works on ascetic and other sub- jects, and was a traditionist. He was preceptor to some of the Abbaside family and ono of his pupils was al Mua’tadhid. He received a pension of fifteen dinars a month. Died A. H. 281, (A. D. 894). De Slane, I. K. § A Tabi’i and one of the seven great jurisconsults of Medina and a traditionist of repute, died A. H. 103. An Nawawi. 8 [ 38 ] that the Apostle of God said, ^“ virtuous qualities are three hundred and and sixty in number; when God desires a good servant, he creates in him one of these qualities through which, he may gain admission to paradise.”’ Abu Bakr said “O Apostle of God is there in me one of them?” He replied, “Yes, the sum of them all.” And Ibn A’sdkir according to another ascription through Sadakah from some other, “ virtuous qualities are three hundred and sixty ;” and Abu Bakr said ‘have I any of these ?”’ He replied, “ all of them are in thee, therefore I give thee joy,O Abu Bakr.” And Ibn A’sakir, according to the ascription of Mujamma’-b-Yakib the Auxiliary, from his father, who said, “ there was a circle of the people round the Apostle of God, clustered together, so that they were as walls around him, but the seat of Abu Bakr among them was vacant, and no one among the people sought to take it, and when Abu Bakr came, he sat down on that seat, and the prophet turned his face towards him and directed to him his discourse, and the people listened.” And from Anas that the Apostle of God said, ‘the love of Abu Bakr, and gratitude towards him is incumbent upon every one of my people.” And he records the same from the tradition of Sahl-b-Saa’d. And from Ayesha, direct from the prophet, “ all men shall be judged excepting Abu Bakr.” On what has been handed down of the sayings of the Companions and pious early Muslims* regarding his merit. Al Bukhari records on the authority of Jabir, that Omar-b-u’l Khat- tab said, “ Abu Bakr is our prince.” And al Bayhakiin the “ Shaa’b ०1 man” (people of the faith) from Omar, that he said, “if the faith of Abu Bakr were weighed against the faith of mankind, it would surely out- weigh them.” And [bn Abi Khaythamah and A’bdu’llah-b-Ahmad in the Zawiid uz Zuhd (Profusions of Piety) from Omar that he said, “ verily Abu Bakr was ever foremost and conspicuous—verily I would I were a hair on the breast of Abu Bakr” (Musaddad in his Musnad); and “ I would wish to be in paradise that I might behold Abu Bakr” (Ibn Abid Dunya and Ibn A’sakir) ; and ^ the fragrance of Abu Bakr is sweeter than the fragrance of musk” (Abu Nua’ym). Ibn A’sakir records from A’li that he went to Abu Bakr and found that he was reciting the praises of God, and he said “no one shall look * According to Abu’l Mahdsin wd! is particularly applied to Ayesha, Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman Talhah, az Zubayr, Mu’awiyah and A’mr-b-u’]